Calculating the Year Length of a Gak Planet

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stevemotto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period Planets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the year length of a Gak planet using Kepler's third law. The Gak measures the gravitational force and the average distance to its sun, leading to an initial calculation of the orbital period. However, there is confusion regarding the variables used in the formula, particularly the mass "M," which should refer to the mass of the sun, not the planet. The participant suspects an error in their approach, particularly regarding the inclusion of the planet's radius. Clarification is sought on the correct application of Kepler's law and the variables involved.
Stevemotto
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
Question: A Gak it a type of alien that lives on a planet in another galaxy. One day a Gak decides to find out a little more about his planet. He drops a ball (it starts at rest) with a mass of 6.18 kg and notes that it takes 0.928 s to fall a distance of 8.37 m.
The Gak’s planet orbits its sun in a roughly circular orbit. The average distance to the Gak’s sun is 6.85 × 10^8 km. The Gak measures the force of attraction between his planet and his Sun and finds that this is 2.89 × 10^20 N.

How long is a year on the Gak’s planet?My Attempt:

So I started with the formula T^2 = 4(pi^2)(R^3)/GM

R = 6.85*10^8 (from avg distance)

Since on a previous question I found the mass of Gak's planet to be M = 2.12*10^24 (and got it right). Subbing it in & all relevant variables;

So; T^2 = 4(pi^2)(6.85*10^11)^3/(6.67*10^-11)(2.12*10^24)

T = 2.9956*10^11
Then multiply this by 1/(60*60*24*365) for Earth Years, I get;

T = 9499 yrs

And this is apparently wrong...


Can someone tell me what I did wrong? I'm starting to suspect that R didn't include the radius of the planets and I might need to add it in... I've attached the quiz for reference.
 

Attachments

  • sigh.png
    sigh.png
    23.9 KB · Views: 429
  • sigh 2.png
    sigh 2.png
    5.4 KB · Views: 432
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you are using all the right variables in the formula for Kepler's law?
 
I believe so from my understanding.
 
Stevemotto said:
I believe so from my understanding.

Why did you use ##M = ## mass of the planet?
 
Isn't the "M" variable the mass of the planet?
 
Stevemotto said:
Isn't the "M" variable the mass of the planet?

In Kepler's 3rd law, no. A planet's orbit is independent of its mass.
 
  • Like
Likes Stevemotto
Oh it's the mass of the sun...
 
Back
Top