Calculating Time for Sliding Chain through Hole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for half of a flexible chain to slide through a hole, using conservation of energy principles. The user initially derived a position function but struggled to correctly apply it to find the time when half the chain has fallen. Clarifications were made regarding the total length of the chain, emphasizing that L should not be altered to 1.3 m. The user acknowledged their mistake in calculating the time for the entire chain instead of just half. Ultimately, the solution requires correctly setting x(t) to L/2 to find the desired time.
derravaragh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A flexible chain of mass M and length L lies on a frictionless table, with a very short portion of its length L0 hanging through a hole. Initially the chain is at rest. Find a general equation for y(t), the length of chain through the hole, as a function of time. (Hint: Use conservation of energy. The answer has the form y(t) = Ae^(γt) + Be^(-γt) where γ is a constant.) Calculate the time when 1/2 of the chain has gone through the hole. Data: M = 1.4 kg; L = 2.6 m; L0 = 0.3 m.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This problem has been asked before, and I've worked through it, but I can't seem to get it right. I've solved the position function to be:
x(t) = (x0/2)e^(√(g/l)t) + (x0/2)e^(-√(g/l)t)

which can then be solved for t to get:
t = √(L/g)*arcosh((L-x0)/x0)

Since I want the time when half the chain has gone though, I solve using L = 1.3 m, but I can't seem to get it. Any help on where I've gone wrong would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
derravaragh said:
x(t) = (x0/2)e^(√(g/l)t) + (x0/2)e^(-√(g/l)t)

which can then be solved for t to get:
t = √(L/g)*arcosh((L-x0)/x0)

Shouldn't the variable x appear on the right hand side of your equation for t? You might double check how you got the expression for t.
Since I want the time when half the chain has gone though, I solve using L = 1.3 m, but I can't seem to get it. Any help on where I've gone wrong would be appreciated.

Doesn't L denote the total length of the chain? So, you aren't free to let it be 1.3 m.
 
I realized where I went wrong, I had solved for the time t when the entire chain had fallen over the side, so I went back and solved for when x(t) = L/2. Thank you for your help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top