Calculating Time for Subway Travel with Maximum Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter jehan4141
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum travel time between two subway stations 0.7 km apart, considering a maximum acceleration of 0.1 m/s². The initial calculation suggested a travel time of 118 seconds, but the correct answer is 170 seconds. The error arises from not accounting for the requirement that the train must come to a complete stop at both stations, necessitating acceleration for half the distance and deceleration for the other half. Participants clarify that the velocity must be zero at both endpoints, leading to the correct time calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of including stopping conditions in motion equations.
jehan4141
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
You can find this problem with supplemental pics on page 6 at http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/ph101_2006/learning_guide_ph101_2006.pdf

Suppose that the maximum possible acceleration for passengers standing on a subway is 0.1 m/s^2 and that two subway stations are 0.7 km apart.

What is the minimum possible time taken between the two subways stations?
___________________________________________________________________

The answer is 170 seconds. I keep getting 118 seconds :(

My calculations are as follows:

x = (0.5)(acceleration)(time^2) where x = 700 meters and acceleration is 0.1

thus, sqrt(2x/acceleration) = time = 118

Can anybody tell me what I am doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the train has to stop at both stations, so you need to impose the condition that the velocity at both stations is zero. Right now the velocity won't be zero at the next station.
 
jehan4141 said:
Can anybody tell me what I am doing wrong?
What must the speed be at the start and end of the trip?
 
They may be thinking that you accelerate fo half the distance, then decelerate for the remaining half.
 
Yes! Thank you so much everyone!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top