Calculating time from velocity and acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion outlines a method for calculating acceleration from velocity and acceleration using a car's power, resistive forces, and RPM. The approach involves determining power loss, net power, velocity, net force, and maximum acceleration at a specific RPM. A key point raised is the challenge of calculating acceleration from 0 RPM, suggesting the use of torque curves instead of power due to the engine's inability to operate at zero RPM. Additionally, the issue of tire slip is mentioned, indicating that a lower coefficient of friction should be considered until the engine speed matches the wheel speed. Overall, the method aims to accurately estimate acceleration times based on these calculations.
robinfisichel
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Simple? You would think so , see if you agree with my approach...

I have a car, I know its power at certain Rpm's and I know the magnitude of resitive forces.

So
1. I calculate the power loss due to resitive forces
2. I calculate the net power by subtracting this from motive power.
3. I calculate the velocity from the Rpm of the motor, through gearing down to wheel speed and then tangental velocity.
4. I calculate the net force by dividing by velocity.
5. Dividing by the mass gives me the max acceleration at a particular rpm.

Now i want to calculate how quickly i can accelerate from 0-30 m/s (for example) so using a=dv/dt and rearranging for dt = dv/a i should be able to calculate how long it takes to accelerate from a certain speed at a certain acceleration.

Would people agree with this approach

One problem with this is for this motor, and most other motors, the power at 0 rpm is zero, so i should probably use the torque curve rather than the power??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the power and the rpm, then you know the torque of the engine (power = torque X rpm).

No engine goes to 0 rpm. You have to start at some base rpm, where slipping will occur (at the tires or at the clutch). If you assume the tires slip, you can use the lower "sliding" coefficient of friction until the speed of the engine corresponds with the one of the wheel.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top