Calculating Total Spring Constant of Parallel Springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter MilenaMath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
When a spring with spring constant k and length L is cut in half, each half has a spring constant of 2k, effectively doubling its stiffness. When placed in parallel, the total spring constant is calculated by adding the individual spring constants, resulting in a total of 4k. The key point is that cutting the spring reduces its length, which in turn affects its deflection under a given force, leading to increased stiffness. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between length, stiffness, and force in spring mechanics. Ultimately, the correct total spring constant for the parallel springs is 4k.
MilenaMath
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A spring with spring constant k and of unstretched length L is cut in half and both parts are put side by side.
Determine the total spring constant of the parallel springs.
Can anyone explain me the solution to this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MilenaMath said:
A spring with spring constant k and of unstretched length L is cut in half and both parts are put side by side.
Determine the total spring constant of the parallel springs.
Can anyone explain me the solution to this.

Since the springs are in parallel, they will both have the same displacement. Knowing this and examining the equation for the restoring force of the spring you can find that:

F = kx

F = k1x + k2x = (k1+k2)x

Keeping the second equation in the same "form" as the first,

k = k1 + k2

This is more of an introductory physics question. Make sure to read the stickies before posting.
 
But the correct answer is 4K,I did the same thing,but the professor says 4K,I can't find the mistake
 
What is the spring constant of half of the original spring?
 
My solution was: I assumed the F=kx,k is the spring constant of the initial spring,then I said ##k_1= F/(x/2)## so is ##k_2## and thus ##k_1=k_2=2k => k_t=4k##
But he says my mistake is that I can't say ##k_1= F/(x/2)## but the rest is ok
 
MilenaMath said:
My solution was: I assumed the F=kx,k is the spring constant of the initial spring,then I said ##k_1= F/(x/2)## so is ##k_2## and thus ##k_1=k_2=2k => k_t=4k##
But he says my mistake is that I can't say ##k_1= F/(x/2)## but the rest is ok
Your answer is correct but so is the professor's comment. You need to explain more clearly, in terms of the spring's unstretched lengths, not its displacement, why cutting a spring in half doubles its stiffness.
 
I found out my mistake: So the right way to proceed is We apply force ##F_x## to the spring and let's assume it stretches to length ##x_n-L## then we have ##F_x=k(x_n-L)## .Then we cut the spring into half and both of them would stretch to##x/2## length when ##F_x## force is applied but both of them will have untretched lengths equal to ##L/2## so we have ##F_x=k_1(\frac{x}{2}-\frac{L}{2})## and ##F_x=k_2(x/2-L/2)## we can't say anything about force constants ##k_1## and ##k_2## yet. but combining last 2 equations and knowing it is equal to the equation at the beginning we find that total force(spring) constant is equal to 4k.
 
This is a bit of a 'circular' proof in that you assume that the spring will stretch only 1/2 as much when it it is cut in half, but this is what you are trying to prove.
The deflection of the spring is directly proportional to its length and force, and the amount of its deflection is dependent on its geometric and elastic properties. Since you halve its length, you halve its deflection under a given force, and thus double its stiffness k. Then you put the cut springs in parallel, so each sees just half the force, which effectively quadruples the effective equivalent stiffness.
 
Back
Top