Calculating Uncertainty in Averages for Scientists

  • Thread starter Thread starter spikethekitty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about calculating uncertainty in averages for the Franck-Hertz experiment, the user seeks guidance on determining the uncertainties associated with the differences between minimum values A, B, C, D, and E. The values and their respective uncertainties are provided, and the user aims to calculate the average of these differences. The "sum of squares" rule is mentioned as a method for calculating uncertainty, along with a simpler approach that sums the maximum deviations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately propagating uncertainties in scientific measurements. Properly applying these methods will enhance the reliability of the experimental results.
spikethekitty
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In my lab we are doing Franck Hurtz experiment with heated mercury and electron beams. We already took data but i need a little help. I have the locations of the minimums A B C D and E, and each point has it's own uncertainty. a b c d and e. What i needed to find was the difference between each min and the next, so A-B, B-C... and then find the average of each these differences. I don't know how to do the uncertainty for my calculations.


Homework Equations


My actual values are
1.4
1.94
2.43
2.98
3.66
With uncertanities (in order)
0.003686
0.008077
0.002263
0.009459
0.003834


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that the most general rule is the "sum of squares" rule,
(\Delta d)^2 = (\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta y)^2
where d = x - y is the difference of two independent quantities x and y.

However, I think that
(\Delta d) = (\Delta x) + (\Delta y)
is also commonly used, giving the "rough" estimate that the deviation from the mean is at most the sum of the two maximal deviations.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top