Calculating Vector Magnitude and Angle

AI Thread Summary
To find the magnitude and angle of Vector B - 2(Vector A), the correct approach involves subtracting twice the components of Vector A from those of Vector B. The calculations for the x and y components should be: x = Bx - 2Ax and y = By - 2Ay. The magnitude is then calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, and the angle is determined using the arctangent of the y component divided by the x component. There was confusion regarding the negative sign in the calculations, but it was clarified that it does not affect the outcome when handled correctly. The final results should reflect the correct operations on the vector components.
viet1919
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the magnitude and angle to
Vector B - 2(Vector A)?


Homework Equations



A sub x: 44cos28 = 38.85
A sub y: 44sin28 = 20.66
B sub x: 26.5cos56 = 14.82 <-- (Does the negative sign matter in 26.5? My teacher said it's not)
B sub y: 26.5sin56 = 21.97

The Attempt at a Solution


I multiplied the Vector A's by two.
A sub x: 38.85 x 2 = 77.7
A sub y: 20.66 x 2 = 41.2

I then solved for the x and y components.
x: (77.7) + (14.82) = 92.52
y: (41.2) - (21.97) = 19.23

Then I solved for the magnitude and angle.
Magnitude:
\sqrt{}(92.52)2 + (19.23)2= 94.50

Angle: tan-1 = 19.23/92.52 --> 11.74°

Is this correct? I have a weird feeling that it's wrong. I feel like I am missing something some wear. I really can't tell.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
viet1919 said:

Homework Statement



What is the magnitude and angle to
Vector B - 2(Vector A)?


Homework Equations



A sub x: 44cos28 = 38.85
A sub y: 44sin28 = 20.66
B sub x: 26.5cos56 = 14.82 <-- (Does the negative sign matter in 26.5? My teacher said it's not)
B sub y: 26.5sin56 = 21.97

Correct so far...

viet1919 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I multiplied the Vector A's by two.
A sub x: 38.85 x 2 = 77.7
A sub y: 20.66 x 2 = 41.2

I then solved for the x and y components.
x: (77.7) + (14.82) = 92.52
y: (41.2) - (21.97) = 19.23

You have to find the vector \vec{B} - 2\vec{A}; subtracting twice of \vec{A} from \vec{B}. Do the same with both components: Evaluate Bx-2Ax and By-2Ay. These will be the components of a new vector \vec{C}, to determine the magnitude and angle of it.

viet1919 said:
Then I solved for the magnitude and angle.
Magnitude:
\sqrt{92.52^2 + 19.23^2}= 94.50

Angle: tan-1 = 19.23/92.52 --> 11.74°

Is this correct? I have a weird feeling that it's wrong. I feel like I am missing something some wear. I really can't tell.


ehild
 
Oh so you're saying what I should've done was
x: 14.82 - 77.7
y: 21.97 - 41.2
Is that so? And If you looked at the 26.5cos56. I thought it was -26.5cos56. But my teacher said the sign negative sign didn't matter or something. What does he mean?
 
At first it was this. Then I think we got rid of the negatives and made it positive.
Therefore using the equations

2(a sub x) + b sub x
and
2(a sub y) - b sub y
 

Attachments

  • this.PNG
    this.PNG
    8.6 KB · Views: 464
viet1919 said:
Oh so you're saying what I should've done was
x: 14.82 - 77.7
y: 21.97 - 41.2

Yes, it will be all right.

viet1919 said:
Is that so? And If you looked at the 26.5cos56. I thought it was -26.5cos56. But my teacher said the sign negative sign didn't matter or something. What does he mean?

First you calculated the x and y components of the vectors A and B. Then you did the operations with the components, multiplying by two and subtracting 2A from B.

Vectors can be add and subtract, and multiplied by scalars. You do it with the components, as the components are simply numbers. Then the results will be the components of the new vector.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah ok I get it now! Wow it amazes me how you can sort of "play" with the numbers and still get the same answer. Thank you so much ehild.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top