Calculating velocity, time, and Instantaneous speed using kinematic equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two stones thrown vertically downward from a 52.0-meter cliff. The first stone has an initial speed of 2.10 m/s, and the student seeks to determine the time it takes for both stones to hit the water and the necessary initial velocity for the second stone to ensure they land simultaneously. Key equations used include kinematic equations for velocity and displacement, with a focus on the acceleration due to gravity, which is consistently -9.81 m/s². The conversation highlights confusion regarding the application of these equations and the assumption of vertical motion, clarifying that the angle of throw can be considered 90 degrees for simplification. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying kinematic principles to solve the problem effectively.
Absolutism
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An inquisitive physics student and mountain climber climbs a 52.0-m-high cliff that overhangs a calm pool of water. He throws two stones vertically downward, 1.00 s apart, and observes that they cause a single splash. The first stone has an initial speed of 2.10 m/s.


(a) How long after release of the first stone do the two stones hit the water?


(b) What initial velocity must the second stone have if the two stones are to hit the water simultaneously?

(c) What is the speed of each stone at the instant the two stones hit the water?
first stone m/s
second stone m/s

Homework Equations



vf^2=vi^2+2a(xf-xi)
xf=xi+vi t+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to find the T

xi=52m
xf=0?
vi=2.10m/s
a=-9.81m/s^2
vf= (by the first equation) = 32m/s

I tried plugging in the result in the second equation, but it's starting not to make sense.
I was told that I have to assume the stones to have been thrown vertically but with an angle, because it wouldn't make sense otherwise, but I am having difficulty getting what that angle is, and this assignment does not include the trig functions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the stones are thrown vertically downward, you can think of the angle being 90° (the angle between the positive x-axis and the negative y-axis). The horizontal component of the velocity (magnitude*cos90) = 0 and the vertical component of the velocity (magnitude*sin90) is just the original magnitude. In that aspect, this can be thought of as a 1-dimensional problem.

Absolutism said:
xi=52m
xf=0?
That would work. The distances are relative to each other; you are only interested in the difference between the distances. (The second equation can be rewritten as xf-xi=vi t+1/2at^2). You could have also, for example, set xi=0 and xf=-52.

Also, don't forget the equation vf=vi+at :wink:

Edit: If you were told that the angle wasn't 90° and you weren't given the angle, then you don't have enough information to solve the problem. Although, 90° seems plausible since the stones can be thrown vertically if the student reaches over the ledge.
 
Last edited:
Ninty64 said:
If the stones are thrown vertically downward, you can think of the angle being 90° (the angle between the positive x-axis and the negative y-axis). The horizontal component of the velocity (magnitude*cos90) = 0 and the vertical component of the velocity (magnitude*sin90) is just the original magnitude. In that aspect, this can be thought of as a 1-dimensional problem.


That would work. The distances are relative to each other; you are only interested in the difference between the distances. (The second equation can be rewritten as xf-xi=vi t+1/2at^2). You could have also, for example, set xi=0 and xf=-52.

Also, don't forget the equation vf=vi+at :wink:

Edit: If you were told that the angle wasn't 90° and you weren't given the angle, then you don't have enough information to solve the problem. Although, 90° seems plausible since the stones can be thrown vertically if the student reaches over the ledge.


So I cannot consider the acceleration as -9.81 because this isn't a free falling, right?
 
Absolutism said:
So I cannot consider the acceleration as -9.81 because this isn't a free falling, right?
The acceleration of gravity on Earth is always -9.81m/s^2. An object speeding at 3000m/s towards the ground will feel the same -9.81m/s^2 acceleration as an object that has just been dropped. In reality, an object going at 3000m/s might be slowing down if the air resistance is large enough, but the gravitational acceleration is still -9.81m/s^2 (assuming it's close to the Earth's surface).
 
But if the vf=32 m/s then using the second equation

32=2.10+ (-9.81)t
the t = -3.04 which isn't possible. I am not sure where I went wrong.
 
Velocity is a vector. Since the velocity is downwards, it is negative. When you took the square root to solve for the final velocity, you wrote + instead of +/-
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top