Calculating Volume of Rotated Geometry: Algorithm or Integration?

tuoni
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Unfortunately my geometry is a little rusty: if I have an area A(x,y), and rotate it around axis z (yielding a symmetrical, circular body), what is the algorithm to calculate volume?

Or am I remembering incorrectly, and the algorithms were for very specific shapes?

E.g. a circular cylinder with a cone on top; viewed from the side it has a cross-sectional area A, and rotated around axis z you get volume.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The only "algorithm" is "Heron's formula": the volume of a solid of revolution, that is, a two-dimensional region rotated around an axis, is the area of the region times the distance the center of the region moves. That, in turn, is the area times 2 \pi times the distance from the center to the axis of rotation.

Of course, for a general region, finding the center requires integration. So you might as well do it as an integral to start with.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top