Calculating Water Flow: Time to Fill Canister

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time required to fill a container with water, considering factors like container capacity, foot valve size, and water depth. Tests indicate a flow rate of approximately 3.5 liters per second at a depth of 1 meter with specific valve and air pipe sizes. The impact of air line length and diameter on evacuation time is questioned, along with the effects of using compressed air for pumping water. The user seeks a formula that incorporates various parameters to predict filling time accurately. The relationship between air line characteristics and filling efficiency remains a key concern.
Red Dog
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to work out a formula to calculate how long it might take to fill a container of a known capacity in various depths of fresh water. The container would have a foot valve for entry and a pipe extending above the surface for air displacement. Tests at 1metre deep have given about 3.5 litres per second for a 40mm and 50mm foot valve and an air pipe of 13mm and 20mm.
I have a formula for working out the pressure at a set depth and I am assuming that it should fill more quickly the deeper it is.
Will the length and/or the diameter of the air line affect the time it takes for the air to evacuate?
If I pump the water using compressed air, would the advantage of the extra water over the canister be negated by the extra head to pump?
I would like to input values for canister volume, foot valve size, depth and air line diameter and obtain the time it will take to fill.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the air line had zero diameter or an infinite length, do you think this would have an effect?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top