Calculating Wave Frequency from Source and Receiver Measurements

grapejellypie
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wave source approaches you at constant speed and you measure a wave frequency f1. As the source passes and then recedes, you measure frequency f2. Find the expression for the frequency emitted if the source were stationary in terms of f1, f2, and wave speed v.


Homework Equations


I'm not sure which equations are relevant, but here are some:
f=v/λ (where λ = wavelength)
for situations in which the source is in motion relative to a stationary receiver
fr=(fs)/(1±u/v) where fr=frequency the receiver receives; fs= frequency emitted by source, u=speed of source, and v= wave speed)


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to go about solving this problem. I know that the answer will be in terms of variables...
I also know that fs= fr when the source and receiver are stationary
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You are a little bit confused.
The problem asks to find fs. This is the frequency of the source and this is what the onserver will detect if the source is stationary.
f1 and f2 are the values of fr corresponding to the two signs in your formula for the Doppler effect.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top