Calculating Wave Velocity & Wavelength

AI Thread Summary
A sound wave with a velocity of 600 m/s and a wavelength of 3 m has a frequency of 200 Hz, leading to a time of 0.0025 seconds for a molecule to return to its normal position. In a separate problem, the velocity of transverse waves on a string is 200 m/s with a frequency of 500 Hz, resulting in a wavelength of 0.4 m. The distance between nodes in standing waves is half the wavelength, which is 0.2 m. The discussion clarifies that the length of the string (L) is not needed to determine the distance between nodes, as the frequency and wave speed provide sufficient information. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving wave-related problems effectively.
timtng
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A sound wave of velocity 600 m/s has a wavelength of 3 m. At a certain instant one of the molecules of the medium is at its normal position. How long will it be before this same molecule is again at its normal position?

v=fλ, f=v/λ =(600m/s)/3m = 200Hz
T=1/f=1/200=.005s

t=T/2 = .0025s Is this answer correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another problem of the same sort.

Standing waves are produced on a string for which the velocity of transverse waves is 200 m/s. The frequency of vibration is 500 Hz. How far apart are the nodes?

I can only find λ, λ=v/f=200/500=.4m

I don't know how to finish the rest of the problem
 
So the answer should be λ/2?
 
shouldn't the answer be: L-λ/2
 
I figured since they ask how far apart are the nodes, L has to be a contributing factor.
 
I figured since they ask how far apart are the nodes, L has to be a contributing factor.

Did you notice that there was no "L" given in the problem?

We were given, instead, the frequency.

If you were given the wavespeed (determined by the mass and tension of the string) and length, then you could find the frequency. Here, that's not necessary.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top