Calculating Weight and Velocity on a Circular Track: Formulas and Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics-dummy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
AI Thread Summary
To calculate weight on a circular track, Newton's law of gravitation is essential for determining weight in Newtons, especially for an object on an asteroid. For the Porsche moving at a steady speed, centripetal acceleration can be used to find velocity without needing mass, using the formula a = v²/r. The conversion from meters per second to kilometers per hour involves multiplying by 3.6, as 1 m/s equals 3.6 km/hr. Proper unit management is crucial in these calculations to avoid confusion. Understanding these principles aids in solving similar physics problems effectively.
physics-dummy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

:

#1. You are walking on a perfectly round asteroidwith a diameter of 40km and a mass of 10 to the 16th kg. your mass is 60kg. how much will you weigh, in Newtons?

#2 a 100 kg porshe is moving at a steady speed around a cicular track waith a 1000 m radius. The porshe's centripedal acceleration is 5 m/s squared. What is teh magnitude of its velocity?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried a=v squared/r but it doesn't include the mass so i didn't think it's right and I've looked through all my notes and can't find a formula for the second one. For the first one I'm lost cause f=ma don't work. any help i would be grateful for, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track for the second one, and you don't need the mass. On the first one look up Newton's law of gravitation.
 
thank you very much. after i get 71 for the second answer how do i change it into km/hr
 
Put units on things, ok? If you got 71m/sec and you really want to convert to km/hr, then 1m=km/1000 and 1sec=hr/3600. Now what? Units are your friends, they help you from being confused.
 
Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top