Calculating Work and Kinetic Energy in Uniform Circular Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter captain.joco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Force Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a string on a particle in uniform circular motion as its radius changes. The key equations include the tension force, kinetic energy, and the relationship between initial and final velocities using angular momentum conservation. The participant attempts to derive the work-energy theorem, noting that the work done should equal the change in kinetic energy. Despite consistent units, confusion arises regarding the integration process, specifically the absence of a factor of one-half in the final expression for work. The participant seeks clarification on the force as a function of radius and the correct integration method to reconcile the results.
captain.joco
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is tied to a string which goes through a hole in a smooth horizontal table. The particle moves in uniform circular motion with speed v0. The radius of the cricle is R0. By puling the string very slowly, the radius of the circular motion is reduced tao R1.
Show that the work done by the string force is equal to the change of Kinetic energy.

Homework Equations


F=Tension(T) = mv^2 /R
K ( kinetic energy ) =1/2mv^2
K1-K0 ( final - initial kinetic energy ) = 1/2m ( v1^2 - v0^2 )
where v1 = R0*v0/R1 ( using angular momentum conservation ).


The Attempt at a Solution


W=∆K ( work energy theorem )
W = ∫Fdr , where F = m*v*v / r ( centripetal force )
I think I need some substitution to get the integral to give the ∆E...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With the integrand of F = m*v*v/r multiplied by dr, one has units of kg m2/s2 (assuming SI) which is units of kinetic energy.
 
I know that the units are consistent. I have found the change in Kinetic energy, which is deltaK = 1/2 *v0^2 * [( R0^2 / R1^2 ) - 1 ].
But when I integrate mv1^2/R1 dR ( between R0 and R1 ), I get the very same expression but without the 1/2 factor at the start.. What am I doing wrong?
 
What's the force as a function of R?
 
I solved the integral and I got the same expression as in for the difference in kinetic energy, so it's got to be right. Thanks for Your help!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top