Calculating work done by gravity

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a user calculates the work done by gravity on a 10kg bucket lifted 3.0m, initially using the formula Work = Force * Distance, resulting in 294J. However, the answer key indicates that the work done by gravity is -300J, emphasizing the negative sign due to the force of gravity acting in the opposite direction of the lift. The conversation clarifies that while the simpler method is valid for one-dimensional problems, the more complex equation Wext = Fextdcosθ is more general and applicable in various scenarios. Ultimately, both methods yield the same result in this specific case since the angle is zero. The user decides to stick with the simpler approach for this problem.
JustynSC
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 10kg bucket of water is lifted vertically 3.0m at a constant speed. How much work did gravity do on the bucket during this process?

Homework Equations


Work=Force*Distance (what thought to use)
Wext=Fextdcosθ (what the answer key says to use.

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt got me as far as plugging in: Work=(9.8m/s2*10kg)*3.0m=(98N)*3.0kg=294J
***In the answer key they used 10m/s2 for gravity, but also had a negative answer of -300J. I assume that they used the negative as a direction, but is work a vector or scalar? Looking to understand why the way I did this does not yeild the same answer, and how the formula the keys says to use works?***
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force is in the opposite direction of motion, therefore work done by gravity is negative. You should change the sign of either the acceleration or the 3 meter distance, because they point in opposite directions.
 
Okay thanks I was thinking something along those lines, but why would the key ask to solve using that other equation? It seems more complicated than the way I did it. does my method only work in limited scenarios and the other has a broader range of uses?
 
Well, the equation with the angle is more general, but as your problem is one-dimensional you don't need that.
 
I see. In that case I will stick to my simple method :) Thanks!
 
In this case the angle is zero and Cos(0)=1 so both equations are the same.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top