Calculating Work for Satellite Orbits Around Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done to place satellites in specific orbits around Earth, addressing two problems. For the first problem, the user calculates gravitational force and potential energy but questions whether the work done should be negative, indicating confusion about the relationship between gravitational work and energy changes. The second problem involves moving a satellite to a higher orbit, and the user successfully computes the changes in potential and kinetic energy to find the total work done. The calculations yield results of approximately 2.386E10 Joules for the first satellite and 3.6123E9 Joules for the second, with a request for verification of these results. The thread highlights the importance of understanding energy conservation in orbital mechanics.
cobrasny
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A satellite mass 481 is in circular orbit of 9.29x10^6 m above the surface of the Earth
the weight of a 65.1 kg astronaut inside the satellite
What work was done (ignoring friction) to put the satellite into this orbit. Assume it started at rest on the surface of the Earth


Also, A satellite of mass 730 kg is in circular orbit around the Earth, 3.12x10^6 m above the surface of the Earth. Find the minimum work needed to move the satellite outward and put it in circular orbit at a new height of 6.05x10^6 m above the surface of the Earth

Homework Equations


U = -GMm/r
fg = GMem/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


For the first problem, I tried fg = GMem/r^2, (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 65.1 / (9.29 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6)^2 and got 105.69 N

For the second, U = -GMm/r; W = Ui-Uf
- (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 481 / (6.371 x 10^6) - (- (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 65.1 / (9.29 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6) = -1.78E10 Should the work be negative? Is that the work done by gravity, so the work done to move the satellite is the same magnitude, opposite sign?

I tried a similar strategy for the third problem, and it did not work there either.

Hopefully you can help me understand what I am doing wrong. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cobrasny said:
A satellite mass 481 is in circular orbit of 9.29x10^6 m above the surface of the Earth
the weight of a 65.1 kg astronaut inside the satellite
What work was done (ignoring friction) to put the satellite into this orbit. Assume it started at rest on the surface of the Earth

U = -GMm/r
fg = GMem/r^2

For the first problem, I tried fg = GMem/r^2, (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 65.1 / (9.29 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6)^2 and got 105.69 N

Hi cobrasny! :smile:

Hint: for a circular orbit, the work done is the change in U plus the change in KE. :wink:
 
So..
- (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 481 / (9.29 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6) - (- (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 481 / (6.371 x 10^6) = 1.78E10
is just the change in potential energy.

The change in kinetic energy, 1/2mv^2;
v^2 = GMe/r
Re = 6.371x10^6
v=2pi r/T
Vsurface = 2pi 6.371x10^6/(24hrx60minx60sec)

1/2m (vf^2-vi^2)...
.5 (481) [((6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) / (9.29 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6)) - (2pi 6.371x10^6/ (24x3600))^2] = 6.063E9

Do I then add the change in Ek and change in Eu? To get 1.78E10 + 6.063E9 = 2.386E10 Joules of work?
 
All right, that worked for the second problem.

Two to go:
A satellite of mass 730 kg is in circular orbit around the Earth, 3.12x10^6 m above the surface of the Earth. Find the minimum work needed to move the satellite outward and put it in circular orbit at a new height of 6.05x10^6 m above the surface of the Earth

Delta U = - (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 730 / (6.05 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6) - (- (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 730 / (3.12 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6) = 7.2247E9

delta k = .5 (730) [((6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) / (6.05 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6)) - ((6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) / (3.12 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6))] = -3.6124E9

So work done = 7.2247E9 + -3.6124E9 = 3.6123E9 Joules (if you could check this I would appreciate it)

A satellite mass 481 is in circular orbit of 9.29x10^6 m above the surface of the Earth
the weight of a 65.1 kg astronaut inside the satellite
I tried fg = GMem/r^2, (6.67x10^-11) x (5.97x10^24) x 65.1 / (9.29 x 10^6 + 6.371 x 10^6)^2 and got 105.69 N
I still don't see what I did wrong here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top