Calculating Work: Hammering a Nail with a 0.40kg Hammer at 5.0 m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter reahsalr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a technician using a 0.40 kg hammer at a speed of 5.0 m/s to drive a nail into wood. The kinetic energy of the hammer before impact is determined to be 5 J, while the gravitational potential energy at a height of 0.75 m is calculated as 3 J. The work done by the technician is derived from the difference between the kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy, resulting in 2 J of work. The conversation clarifies that the hammer's kinetic energy includes contributions from both the technician's force and gravitational pull. Ultimately, the correct calculation of work is confirmed to be 2 J.
reahsalr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A technician uses a hammer to force a nail into a wooden beam.
The hammer has a mass of 0.40kg.
It has a speed of 5.0 m/s just before it hits the nail.
After raising the hammer to a height of 0.75m, how much work does the technician do in hitting the nail with the hammer?


Homework Equations



I also had to work out two parts before hand -
1. The kinetic energy just before it hits the nail - which was 5J using [KE=0.5mv^2]
2. The GPE at a height of 0.75m - which was 3J using [GPE=mgh]

The Attempt at a Solution


I got this last part wrong however, I tried using the formula [W=Fs], so 0.75 * 4 = 3. And got it wrong.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The hammer got its kinetic energy both from the man and from the gravitational pull of Earth. The work of gravity is equal to the gravitational potential energy that you calculated as 3 J (using g=10 m/s^2) The man exerts some downward force to the hammer, so it will be faster when hitting the nail as it were if the man just dropped it to the nail.

So: KE (of the hammer) = 3 J + W (work of the man). You need to give W.

ehild
 
So 5-3 = 2, Answer 2J

Many thanks, I was confused about that
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top