Calculating Work Required to Move a Charge Between Two Identical Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter cashmoney805
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Work
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required to move a +0.5μC test charge between two +35μC charges, the initial and final electric potentials were determined using the formula V = kQ/r. The initial potential was calculated as Vi = 2KQ/0.16, while the final potential was Vf = KQ[1/0.28 + 1/0.04]. The work done by an external force was found using W = -q(Vf - Vi), resulting in -2.5J, but the correct interpretation shows that the work required is +2.5J, as moving a positive charge from lower to higher potential requires energy input. The distinction between work done by the external force and work done by the electric field is clarified, emphasizing that Wext = qΔV for external work. This discussion highlights the importance of understanding potential energy changes in electrostatics.
cashmoney805
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A +35\muC charge is placed 32 cm from an identicle +35\muC charge. How much work would be required to move a +.5\muC test charge midway between them to a point 12cm closer to either of the charges?


Homework Equations


Wext = -qV
V = kQ/r


The Attempt at a Solution


Q= +35\muC, q = +.5\muC
I found the initial V, Vi = 2KQ/.16 and then the final V, Vf = KQ[1/.28 +1/.04]
Then I did W = -q(Vf-Vi) and got -2.5J
However, the answer is +2.5 J. This makes sense that the answer is positive- you're moving a + charge from an area of lower to higher potential. Why doesn't this agree with my formula though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cashmoney805 said:
Why doesn't this agree with my formula though?
Because you are finding the work done by you to move the charge, which is qΔV, not the work done by the field, which is -qΔV.
 
Oh, so Wext = qΔV. So for energy considerations, is it W(by E) + PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf + Wext?
 
cashmoney805 said:
Oh, so Wext = qΔV.
In this particular case, in which you are moving the charge with the least amount of energy (no excess kinetic energy).
So for energy considerations, is it W(by E) + PEi + KEi = PEf + KEf + Wext?
In general, I would say: PEi + KEi + Wext = PEf + KEf
 
Ok. If another problem asks about W from E, would Wext just be negative in the equation you provided?
 
If you want the work done by the electric field, use W = -qΔV.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top