Calculating Work to Lift Kite String from Ground: A Puzzle

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the work required to lift a kite string shaped like a parabola from the ground to a height of 500 ft. The string weighs 1/16 oz/ft and connects the stringholder at (0,0) to the kite at (100,500). The discussion highlights the need to consider the potential energy gained as the string is lifted, suggesting the use of integrals to sum the work done on small segments of the string. It emphasizes the importance of integrating with respect to arc length rather than x, while also noting that calculating work based on the centroid of the curve is valid due to the uniform mass distribution. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
sinas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi - Here's the entire problem to avoid confusion ><

"A kite is flying at a height of 500 ft and at a horizontal distance of 100 ft from the stringholder on the ground. The kite string weighs 1/16 oz/ft and is hanging in the shape of the parabola y=(x^2)/20 that joins the stringholder at (0,0) to the kite at (100,500). Calculate the work (in foot pounds) done in lifting the kite string from the ground to its present position."

I've been messing with arc length of the parabola because I think there might be a way to solve it with that, but I really don't know... Can someone give me a hint??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would like to point out first and foremost that that question is flawed because hanging strings follow hyperbolic not parabolic functions. The potential energy gained by moving the kite from the ground to its current position is equal to the work done to move it there. Consider how much work it takes to move an infinitely small portion of that kite string up a height h where h varies according to the parabolic function h = (x^2)/20. Sum these together and you have the basics of an integral. Be careful not to integrate with respect to x but with respect to the arc-length though, or express the arclength in terms of x.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok I'm playing with that, but tell me something - if I were to calculate the work moving the entire string from 0 to the y-coordinate of the centroid of the curve, that wouldn't work, right? (no pun intended)
 
If I understand what you're trying to do right yes that would work. The centroid is the center of mass after all since the mass is distributed evenly along the string.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top