Calculating Work to Lift Kite String from Ground: A Puzzle

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the work required to lift a kite string shaped like a parabola from the ground to a height of 500 ft. The string weighs 1/16 oz/ft and connects the stringholder at (0,0) to the kite at (100,500). The discussion highlights the need to consider the potential energy gained as the string is lifted, suggesting the use of integrals to sum the work done on small segments of the string. It emphasizes the importance of integrating with respect to arc length rather than x, while also noting that calculating work based on the centroid of the curve is valid due to the uniform mass distribution. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
sinas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi - Here's the entire problem to avoid confusion ><

"A kite is flying at a height of 500 ft and at a horizontal distance of 100 ft from the stringholder on the ground. The kite string weighs 1/16 oz/ft and is hanging in the shape of the parabola y=(x^2)/20 that joins the stringholder at (0,0) to the kite at (100,500). Calculate the work (in foot pounds) done in lifting the kite string from the ground to its present position."

I've been messing with arc length of the parabola because I think there might be a way to solve it with that, but I really don't know... Can someone give me a hint??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would like to point out first and foremost that that question is flawed because hanging strings follow hyperbolic not parabolic functions. The potential energy gained by moving the kite from the ground to its current position is equal to the work done to move it there. Consider how much work it takes to move an infinitely small portion of that kite string up a height h where h varies according to the parabolic function h = (x^2)/20. Sum these together and you have the basics of an integral. Be careful not to integrate with respect to x but with respect to the arc-length though, or express the arclength in terms of x.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok I'm playing with that, but tell me something - if I were to calculate the work moving the entire string from 0 to the y-coordinate of the centroid of the curve, that wouldn't work, right? (no pun intended)
 
If I understand what you're trying to do right yes that would work. The centroid is the center of mass after all since the mass is distributed evenly along the string.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top