Calculating X in Hydrate Na2CO3 . XH2O Using Mass Loss Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter awesome88
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the value of X in the hydrate Na2CO3 . XH2O, it is established that the hydrate loses 54.3% of its mass upon heating, indicating that 54.3 grams of water is lost for every 100 grams of hydrate. This implies that the remaining 45.7 grams corresponds to the anhydrous Na2CO3. The molar mass of Na2CO3 is calculated to be 106 g/mol, while H2O is 18 g/mol. By finding the number of moles of both Na2CO3 and water, the mole ratio can be established to solve for X. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding mass loss and mole calculations in solving hydrate problems.
awesome88
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hydrate problem :(

Homework Statement



When a hydrate of Na2CO3 . XH2O is heated until all of the water is removed, it loses 54.3 % of its mass. What is the value of X?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


such a bad attempt...

Na2CO3=46g + 12g +48g=106g/mol
H2O=18g/mol

106+18=124 x 0.543=67.33g

I have no idea how to do this can someone please help me out
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If 54.3% was water weight, that leaves 45.7% as the anhydride. This is like saying that for each 100 grams of hydrate dried, 54.3 grams was water and 45.7 grams was the anhydride. Can you take it from there?
 
chemisttree said:
If 54.3% was water weight, that leaves 45.7% as the anhydride. This is like saying that for each 100 grams of hydrate dried, 54.3 grams was water and 45.7 grams was the anhydride. Can you take it from there?

The next step could be to find the number of moles of Na2CO3 and the number of moles of water; and then directly find mole ratio.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top