Calculating Z0 Decay Matrix Element: Finding the Error

  • Thread starter Thread starter marlon1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
marlon1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I want to calculate the matrix element of Z0 decay into a fermion, antofermion pair given the propagator, vertex element and fermi's golden rule.

But somewthing is going wrong.

First the propagator has a term 1/Mz^2 so
the MatrixElement^2 will go like 1/Mz^4.

but the vertex factor has a term Mz^2 so the matrix element will finally go
1/Mz^2

But according to the answer the matrix element must go like Mz^2 so I'm wrong a factor Mz^4

take a look here;

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=8956&d=1169839397"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
why do you have a propagtor when it is a tree-level decay... look at your Feymann diagram and you should see no propagtor.. unless I have misunderstood your interaction.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top