Calculation of Clebsch-Gordan coefficients

PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have two spin-1/2 particles and I need to calculate their Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I followed the procedure of applying J_- to |{j,m}\rangle
and J_{1-} and J_{2-} to |{m_1,m_2}\rangle and comparing them. I got correctly
\langle{1,1}|{1/2,1/2}\rangle =1,
\langle{1,0}|{1/2,-1/2}\rangle=1/\sqrt{2},
\langle{1,0}|{-1/2,1/2}\rangle =1/\sqrt{2},
\langle{1,-1}|{-1/2,-1/2}\rangle=1.
Now I want to find \langle{0,0}|{1/2,-1/2}\rangle
and \langle{0,0}|{-1/2,1/2}\rangle.
Therefore I denoted |{0,0}\rangle = \alpha|{1/2,-1/2}\rangle + \beta|{-1/2,1/2}\rangle
and used the normalization condition |\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = 1 and orthogonality to the |{1,0}\rangle state. I got the equation
|\alpha|^2 = 1/2 from which there are 2 options:
\alpha = 1/\sqrt{2} and \alpha = -1/\sqrt{2} (only real coefficients by convention). How do I know which is the right option out of the two?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The overall sign of ##\alpha## doesn't really matter. What's important is the relative phase between ##\alpha## and ##\beta##. What combination of ##\alpha## and ##\beta## will yield a state orthogonal to ##|1, 0\rangle##?
 
Ok. I agree. But the standard table has a certain convention. How do I know how to pick the sign to fit this convention?
 
According to this page, this is the convention:

The Condon-Shortley convention is that the highest m-state of the larger component angular momentum is assigned a positive coefficient.

Still seems a bit ambiguous in your case, though.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top