Calculation of Conduction Electron Population for Semi Conductor

opuktun
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

From this website (link: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/solids/fermi3.html#c1 ), we get the following expression:

Population Density of Conduction Electron = \int ^{\infty}_{Egap}N(E)d(E) = \frac{2^{5/2}(m \pi k T)^{3/2} exp (-E gap/2kT)}{h^3}

My questions are based on the derivation given by the website as follow:-1. EF = Egap / 2
Is this a defined property of semiconductors?2. Is there an error in the following expression?
N(E)d(E) = \frac{8\sqrt{2} \pi m^{3/2}}{h^3} \sqrt{E-Egap}\ e^{-(E-Egap/2)}
I mean originally it has kT in the power of exponential term. Is it mistakenly dropped?3. Is "integration by parts" applied on the following expression?
N(E)d(E) = \frac{8\sqrt{2} \pi m^{3/2}}{h^3} \sqrt{E-Egap}\ e^{-(E-Egap/2)}
Somehow, I can't solve the integration.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formula for density of electrons in conduction band is a good approximation for a classical gas of carriers in intrinsic semiconductors. Only if electron gas is classical you can approximate Fermi - Dirac statistic with Boltzmann one and only if the semiconductor is intrinsic Fermi's level is in the middle of energy gap. In a more general
way Fermi's level depends on doping level, temperature and effective density of states.
Regarding point 2 the exponential factor must be dimensionless.

For more details it's better if you'll see on solid state physics's books. You' ll find clearer derivations than the one you found on the link you posted.

Matteo.
 
Just to address your first question: in intrinsic semiconductors (no impurities present), the Fermi level is often approximated as lying at the center of the band gap. It doesn't lie exactly at the center at non-zero temperatures, however, because the effective masses of holes and electrons are different. A more precise equation is

E_F=E_V+\frac{E_g}{2}+\frac{3}{4}k_B T \ln\frac{m^\star_h}{m^\star_e}
 
Mapes said:
E_F=E_V+\frac{E_g}{2}+\frac{3}{4}k_B T \ln\frac{m^\star_h}{m^\star_e}

Thanks Mapes for the explanation, I finally understood the r/s.

matteo83 said:
Regarding point 2 the exponential factor must be dimensionless.

For more details it's better if you'll see on solid state physics's books. You' ll find clearer derivations than the one you found on the link you posted.

Thanks matteo. I'm gng to hit those books in my lib. :)
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top