What is the Correct Calculation for Making a 0.5N Solution of HNO3 (69%)?

AI Thread Summary
To prepare a 0.5N solution of HNO3 (69%), the correct calculation requires understanding the relationship between normality and the mass of the acid needed. The initial calculation of 3.15g for pure nitric acid is correct, but the conversion to the mass of the 69% solution was incorrect. Instead of using 2.17g of the solution, the correct amount should be 4.56g to account for the concentration of the solution. This discrepancy arises from misapplying the percentage definition in the calculation. Accurate calculations are essential for achieving the desired concentration in solution preparation.
selina
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have to make up a 0.5N solution of HNO3 (69%). I have attempted to do the calculation but am not confident if it is correct. Please see below:

no. moles = cv/1000

c = 0.5N v = 100ml

so no.moles = 0.5 x 100/ 1000 = 0.05 moles

mass = 0.05moles/63 = 3.15g

HN03 (69%) = 2.17g

Therefore 2.17g of HNO3 (69%) in 100ml water = 0.5N

Is this correct? (As someone else seems to have got 4.56g as the answer and I don't know where they obtained this from)

Thank you very much for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0.5N or 0.5M? N stands for normality, and in the case of nitric acid normality may but may not equal molarity.

You are rihht that you need 3.15g of nitiric acid, however, your conversion to mass of 69% solution is wrong. That's obvious at the first sight - you need 3.15 g of acid, yet you plan to use 2.17 g of solution that is not pure acid - in no way 2.17 g will contain 3.15 g.

Try to start with percentage definition and solve it for the mass of the solution. You will know where 4.56 came from.
 
ok thanks for you help, i understand where I've gone wrong. I should have divided 3.15g and not multiplied.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top