Calculation of NonUniform Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resultant vector for a point rotating non-uniformly on a circle, with points A, B, and C spaced 120 degrees apart. The user is seeking a closed-form equation to address the varying time intervals between these points. A suggestion is made to split the circle into segments and utilize integration to find the x-values as a function of y, connecting arclength to the angle. However, the responder notes that additional information may be necessary for a complete solution. The conversation highlights the complexities of non-uniform circular motion and the need for clarity in problem parameters.
rfdes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi -
I have a problem that somewhat mimics an
orbital mechanics problem, but I'm struggling
with seeing the light. My engr math is very
rusty and could use some insight.

Problem Description:

Assume a point rotating non-uniformally
on the circumference of a circle, similar to
a planet around the sun. The exception being
the rotation is at a constant radius. Now,
assume that non uniform time is measured between
points A,B & C, where A,B & C are exactly 120 degrees
apart. So t(AB),t(BC),t(CA) are different.

Is there a closed form equation that would calculate
the resultant vector? Not sure I am explaining this
properly and this may be a very simple exercise in
trig/geometry, however, I cannot seem to figure this
out. If someone is familiar with this, I should could
use some help. Thanks.

Jim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that all the information that's given? If they're 120 degrees apart with a variable circle r then you can split the circle into segments and integrate the x values as a function of y using some clever connection to arclength=sr(theta) and the integral. Given time and and 120 degrees apart you could be talking about a spider monkey's elbow so I think you need more information.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top