I Calculation of vibronic couplings

slawa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm referring to the paper Chem. Phys. v.26 pp.169-177 y.1977 from Cederbaum, Domcke and Köppel where the expressions for linear vibronic coupling parameters are derived in second quantization notation. I'm stuck on the point, where the dependence of the fermionic ladder operators on the nuclear coordinates is eliminated. To be more specific:

H = ∑ii(0)aiai +∑i (0.50.5∂∊i/∂Q)[aiai-ni]Q

is the part of the Hamiltonian I'm interested in. Here the fermionic ladder operators are still dependend on the nuclear coordinates Q (for simplicity let there be just one of it at this time). Now by projecting the ladder operator on an Q-independend basis

ai(Q) = ∑ji(Q)|ϕj(0)>aj(0)

these parts of the hamiltonian should look like:

ii(0)aiai +∑i 0.50.5Qi[aiai-ni]Q + ∑i,j λi,j[aiaj+ajai]Q

where the lambdas are given by

λi,j = lim Q→0[∊i(Q)-∊j(Q)]<ϕj(Q)|∂Qi(Q)>

Up to now I'm pretty shure that I understand how to get the first two summands of the new hamiltonian but the off diagonal coupling term with the lambdas...My last point was, that from the last term in the old hamiltonian leftover terms like this one

-∂Q1(0)[<ϕ1(0)|ϕ1(Q)>a11(Q)|ϕ2(0)>a2+<ϕ2(0)|ϕ1(Q)>a21(Q)|ϕ1(0)>a1]Q-∂Q2(0)[<ϕ1(0)|ϕ2(Q)>a12(Q)|ϕ2(0)>a2+<ϕ2(0)|ϕ2(Q)>a22(Q)|ϕ1(0)>a1]Q

have to become the third summand in the new hamiltonian...Here some link is missing.

Further they state, that from going from the general expression for the lambdas to a two state system, the lambdas can be written as:

λ1,2=0.75*(∂Q22[∊1(Q)-∊2(Q)]2)00.5

So here I'm obviously missing some math ;)

I'd appreciate some help and sorry for the load of equations :|

Greetings
Slawa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the step you are missing is a simple taylor expansion of their eq 6: ## \langle \phi_i(Q)|\phi_j(0)\rangle=\langle \phi_i(0)| \phi_j(0)\rangle +\langle \partial \phi_i(Q)/\partial Q|_{Q=0} |\phi_j(0) \rangle Q ##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top