Calculations Involving Binding Energy of Nucleus

Lissajoux
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The binding energy of a nucleus is given by:

E_{b}=a_{1}A-a_{2}A^{\frac{2}{3}}-a_{3}Z^{2}A^{-\frac{1}{3}}-a_{4}\left(Z-\frac{A}{2}\right)^{2}A^{-1}\pm a_{5}A^{-\frac{1}{2}}

For a given set of isobars, A constant, E_{b} will be maximised at the value of Z that satisfies:

\frac{dE_{b}}{dZ}=0

a) Find this derivative and solve for Z in terms of the a_{i} and A

b) Using the expression derived in part a) and given values of a_{i}, find the value of Z which maximises E_{b} when A=25. Round Z to the nearest integer value.

c) Use the periodic table and the derived value of Z from part b) to determine which element of mass number 25 is a stable isotope.

Homework Equations



Within the problem statement and subsequent solution attempt.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) This is what I have for the differentiated equation:

\frac{dE_{b}}{dZ}=-2Za_{3}A^{-\frac{1}{3}}-a_{4}\left(2ZA^{-1}-1\right)=0

.. this is correct? I think that's all I have to do for this part.

b) I know what the values of A, a_{3}, a_{4} are, so I can put these into the equation, but then how to I 'solve it for Z' from that? I guess that need to find a value of Z such that \frac{dE_{b}}{dZ}=0 right? Not sure how to do this.

c) Once I know what Z is, how do I determine which element of mass number 25 is a stable isotope? I don't really understand this question part.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just gone back and looked at this again.

Using the differential equation calculated, as listed above, I've plugged in the values I know and solved for Z. Have got an answer of Z=12.

So this I assume means I'm looking for whatever is {}_{12}^{25}? which by looking at the periodic table I find that this is {}_{12}^{25}Mn where the 12 just means that's the stable isotope.

.. am I anywhere near with this?!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top