Calculus-based physics textbooks.

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsKid0123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Textbooks
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a rigorous, calculus-based introductory physics textbook that emphasizes conceptual understanding and mathematical derivations. The user expresses dissatisfaction with Wolfson's "Essential University Physics," citing its incompleteness. They are considering "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker, and "University Physics" by Young and Freedman, but are open to other recommendations. Participants suggest that many of the mentioned textbooks are similar, with "An Introduction to Mechanics" by Kleppner and Kolenkow and the Feynman Lectures being highlighted as alternatives that offer different approaches. The advice includes avoiding the latest editions of textbooks to save costs, as newer editions often do not provide significant changes. Additionally, the importance of engaging with professors for deeper understanding is emphasized, alongside recommendations for other resources like Purcell's "Electricity and Magnetism" and Morin's mechanics book. Overall, the discussion focuses on the need for a textbook that supports self-learning through rigorous content.
PhysicsKid0123
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
I am looking for a rigorous-calculus based introductory physics textbook with very good conceptual presentations. I would like one that provides mathematical derivations and proofs for the formulas and equations using calculus. I have a calculus based textbook, but it is severely lacking. The book is Wolfson's essential university physics and from a student's perspective, I would say most of the chapters are incomplete. I've been searching around and I have found two books that I am looking to buy. The first is Fundamental of Physics by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker; 9th edition. The latter is University Physics by Young and Freedman; 12th edition. The reason I want a new textbook is because I cannot grasp ideas unless I read, study, derive/prove, and practice physics. I am a self-learner and I cannot learn simply by looking or listening someone else do physics, namely, my professor. I have seen and skimmed through the inside of these books and they both look good. However, I have not read them thoroughly. Does anyone have a suggestion or advice on which book I should get? Other book recommendations are also welcomed.

P.S. I probably won't get the newest edition. I will probably get one that's one or two editions old.
P.P.S. Thanks in advanced! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An Introduction to Mechanics by Daniel Kleppner and Robert J. Kolenkow, Vibration's and Waves by A.P. French, Optics by Eugene Hecht, An Introduction to Thermal Physics by Daniel V. Schroeder, and Introduction to Electrodynamics by David J. Griffiths. Those should cover the bulk of intro physics
 
You're comparing lots of books that are basically the same book. If you want something that's actually different for freshman mechanics, possibilities would include Kleppner and Kolenkow or the Feynman lectures.

The reason I want a new textbook is because I cannot grasp ideas unless I read, study, derive/prove, and practice physics. I am a self-learner and I cannot learn simply by looking or listening someone else do physics, namely, my professor.
None of this has anything to do with picking a textbook.
 
I totally agree with bcrowell in that most of the books you mentioned are nearly identical. The list given by Phizkid is good, although only Kleppner and French are at an intro level. For E&M I highly recommend Electricity and Magnetism by Purcell (especially the 3rd edition revised by David Morin. Morin's book on mechanics is also great, perhaps consider using it alongside kleppner).
 
There is a second edition of Kleppners book coming out, you can preorder on amazon if you don't mind waiting till the end of the year. FoP with walker is a good reference book for equations, but it isn't going to be of much use for conceptual understanding. We used that book in my intro to physics series, its okay, but it's not very rigorous or conceptual. Physics 4th edition, with H&R&Krane I like a bit better, volume's 1 and two cover intro physics. Feynman lectures are great for conceptual ideas.

Also, don't buy the latest edition of FoP, you'll pay a lot more money for something that is basically the same as the previous edition.

Tripler also has a book close to FoP, which is decent again as a reference but not really what you're looking for.

Morins book might be a bit much, depending on where you're at with things.

In all reality though, you should seek to pick your professors brain to help make the connections you seem to be having trouble with.
 
Last edited:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Back
Top