Calculators Calculus Calculator: Wolframalpha.com & Tips

AI Thread Summary
WolframAlpha is a powerful computational tool that functions like a search engine for mathematical queries. Users can find derivatives by typing "d/dx(function)" and antiderivatives using "∫(function) dx" or "antidifferentiate f(x) dx." While generally reliable, it has been noted that WolframAlpha sometimes produces unexpected simplifications, particularly with trigonometric and advanced integrals, which can lead to confusion. Users have reported finding errors in simple antiderivatives, although many of these instances turned out to be misunderstandings rather than actual mistakes by the tool. For complex differentiation involving variables, such as differentiating with respect to a variable that is part of a multi-dimensional space, users may need to clarify their variables and contexts to achieve accurate results. Overall, WolframAlpha is seen as a valuable supplementary tool for verifying mathematical work, but it should not be solely relied upon.
kashiark
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
Wolframalpha.com is a really good one. It looks like a search engine, and to find the derivative, type in d/dx(function.) To do antiderivatives, you need the symbol ∫. For limits use lim(function) as x->whatever.
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
I found some errors in it doing simple antiderivates.
 
For antiderivatives you can just type "antidifferentiate f(x) dx" or "integrate f(x) dx"
 
Wolfram is generally reliable, Although it often generates solutions that have been simplified in a very strange manner. I find it to be a useful for double checking my work. For indefinite integrals, possible solution pathways are also provided. If you get a question wrong, these usually help pinpoint the problem, Although I'd never completely rely on it. I have always considered it a supplementary tool I can use to verify my knowledge and confidence, nothing else.
 
thrill3rnit3 said:
I found some errors in it doing simple antiderivates.

I have sometimes thought it was making an error, but it has always turned out to be either my error or my misunderstanding of the result returned. Do you have specific examples where it made an error?
 
phyzguy said:
I have sometimes thought it was making an error, but it has always turned out to be either my error or my misunderstanding of the result returned. Do you have specific examples where it made an error?

I have had the same problem (not errors, but "thinking" the wolfram computation was wrong). I have noticed that with lots of trigonometric and some more advanced integrals, wolfram has a tendency to perform odd simplifications that usually throw me off, but that are in fact correct (just not necessary so simple).
 
thrill3rnit3 said:
I found some errors in it doing simple antiderivates.
I haven't had this problem, do you have any examples of when it makes these supposed errors?
 
Leptos said:
I haven't had this problem, do you have any examples of when it makes these supposed errors?

I posted my comment over a year ago, so they have probably fixed the error(s) by now.

either way I don't remember exactly the problem(s), but yeah I did find some error(s).
 
I've just checked this calculator for the partial differentiation of ((x1-m1)^2/s^2) w.r.t 'm' i.e. d/dm(((x1-m1)^2/s^2))

and the result was

(-2 (-m1 + x1)^2 s'[m])/s^3 + (2 (-m1 + x1) (-m1'[m] + x1'[m]))/s^2;

I'm still confused how do we differentiate a function containing 'm1' w.r.t 'm'; m is a 2D variable which consists of (m1,m2).
Can please somebody explain this to me. I'll be really very grateful.
 
  • #10
Wolfram alpha doesn't know that m is a 2d variable consisting of (m1,m2). SInce you differentiated an expression by m, and the expression doesn't contain m (only x1, s, and m1), it assumes that all three of x1, m1, and s are functions of m, and gives you the derivative using that assumption.
 
  • #11
Thank you very much for your reply. Can u tell me how to solve my equation in general or through the calculator?
 
  • #12
It depends what you are trying to do. You might want to read up on vector calculus - I suggest starting with:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_calculus
Do you want the gradient of the scalar function f=((x1-m1)^2/s^2) ? In this case, since f is independent of m2, it would just be df/dm1*e1, where e1 is the unit vector in the m1 direction. What problem are you trying to solve exactly?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
487
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top