Calculus for beginners - Book, Website to learn

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for foundational mathematics knowledge to pursue research in computer science, particularly in proving theorems and algorithms. The individual has completed a bachelor's and master's degree but feels unprepared in areas like design analysis, algorithms, and discrete structures. Recommendations for study materials include Suppes' "Axiomatic Set Theory" for understanding proofs and Tarski's "Introduction to Logic" for logical thinking. Online resources such as MIT OpenCourseWare are suggested for learning calculus, with a specific mention of a Calculus Online Textbook. There is a debate about which calculus book to start with, with one participant expressing a preference for a more engaging, problem-oriented approach to learning. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of mastering fundamental mathematical concepts to advance in computer science research.
kalpana0611
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have completed both my bachelors and masters in the computer science field. The thing is, to go further …in maybe research oriented stuff. I would need to prove theorems and algorithms which for now..I do not think I am good at. I have to start from the basic, and I remember doing some mathematical subjects back in undergraduate days, but even then I did not do well in subjects like..design analysis & algorithm or discrete structures. .and I think I have to learn calculus for that, where do I start, any beginner calculus books that I can find on the Net ?
And how do people actually prove theorems and algorithms in computer science, what other mathematics subjects that should be suggested to people like me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Set Theory is great as a study of proof, I particularly like this book:

Suppes - Axiomatic Set Theory.

It starts at the beginning but is perfectly clear about what facts are being assumed/used in each proof. Each chapter is a little less verbose than the previous one, helping one to gain skill while working through it.
 
In addition to that, a book to get you thinking logically:

Tarski - Introduction to logic

I think if you read this book, do the exercises, and work through Suppes proving all that you can, you'll be "mathematically mature" and ready to go.

You asked about calculus, you can learn it online: MIT OCW

Discrete Mathematics may also be relevant to you but I would do the above first.
 
Last edited:
kalpana0611 said:
Hi Verty

Thank you so much for the reply, I will definitely check it out. On the MIT open courseware,

I also found a book title Calculus Online Textbook at http://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-18-001-calculus-online-textbook-spring-2005/

Should I start with this book or the one with the single variable calculus. Both are introductory courses.

For me it was too slow going; I like to get the content and be able to play with it, like "this is true, this is what it means, here is what it is used for, here are related problems/exercises". It didn't suit me personally but it has a lot of real world problems so you may find it useful. Either would do, it's just that the first one suits my style more.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top