Calculus II - Taylor Series Question

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 3K views
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the power series for f(x) using the definition of taylor series expansion about a=9. f(x)=1/sqrt(x)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Find the power series for f(x) using the definition of taylor series expansion about a=9. f(x)=1/sqrt(x)

f(x) = 1/sqrt(x) => f(9) = 1/3
f'(x) = - 1/(2 x^(3/2)) => f'(9) = -1/54
f''(x) = (1*3)/(2^2 x^(5/2)) => f''(9) = 1/324
f'''(x) = -(1*3*5)/(2^3 x^(7/2)) => f'''(9) = 5/5852
...

The patter that seems to be developing is

f^(k)(x) = ( (-1)^k ?)/(2^k x^(1/2 + k) )
but I'm lost as to how to express the pattern that appears in the numerator, hence the question mark, of each order of the function
for f(x) we have 1
for f'(x) we have 1
for f''(x) we have 1*3
for f'''(x) we have 1*3*5
...
The patter that seems to appear after the 1st derivative in a sort of backwards batter, 5*3*1 instead of 1*3*5, is (2k-1)(2k-3)(2k-5)... until the last term is equal to 1

I'm sort of lost... thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that I don't know how to come up with the series representation of the function because I don't know how to describe the pattern in the numerator with mathematical functions

inf
sigma ( (-1)^k*1*3*(2k-1)*(x-9)^k)/(k!*2^k x^(1/2 + k) )
k=0

I don't know what to do about the question mark because I don't know how to describe the pattern with mathematical functions... maybe I'm over thinking it
 
Last edited:
How would I write the series representation without a double factorial?
 
inf
sigma ( (-1)^k*1*3*(2k-1)*(x-9)^k)/(k!*2^k x^(1/2 + k) )
k=0

for k =0

( (-1)^0*1*3*...*(2*0-1)*(x-9)^0)/(0!*2^0 x^(1/2 + 0) )
(1*3*-1)/sqrt(x)
-3/sqrt(x)
it doesn't seem to work because of the 2*0-1 is negative 1 and doesn't cancel out the 1*3 to leave me with one in the numerator to give me f^(0)(x) = 1/sqrt(x) but instead -3/sqrt(x)?
 
I guess I should learn double factorials than but it's not a standard calculus II topic so that's why I was lead to believe I was doing something wrong but I guess I'm not because I had no clue how to represent the pattern in the numerator
 
You may have to write the sum from k=1 onwards for that reason though i haven't checked.

If you read post #7 there is a couple of different ways to write it. The double factorial is just a nice shorthand for these, but doesn't get used very often in my experience. If I were marking, any of the forms in post #7 would be fine.

The main thing is you recognised the pattern. As micromass points out if you want to be rigorous you should use induction to prove this is the pattern. However looking at the action of the derivative it should be easy to convince yourself it is correct.