Calculus II - Trigonometric Substitutions - Evaluate integral sqrt(x^2-9)/x dx

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on evaluating the integral of sqrt(x^2-9)/x dx using trigonometric substitutions. The user initially arrives at an incorrect answer of sqrt(x^2-9) + 3sin^(-1)(3/x) + C, which does not match the expected solution provided by Wolfram Alpha: sqrt(x^2-9) + 3tan^(-1)(3/sqrt(x^2-9)). Through collaborative feedback, the user realizes their answer is indeed correct upon differentiation, confirming the validity of their approach using cosine substitutions. The conversation also touches on the potential use of hyperbolic substitutions in integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically trigonometric substitutions.
  • Familiarity with differentiation techniques and inverse trigonometric functions.
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions and their properties.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about hyperbolic trigonometric substitutions in integrals.
  • Study the properties and applications of inverse trigonometric functions.
  • Practice using LaTeX for clear mathematical communication.
  • Explore additional examples of trigonometric substitutions in calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, as well as educators and tutors looking for collaborative problem-solving strategies in trigonometric substitutions.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate integral sqrt(x^2-9)/x dx

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I get this for my answer sqrt(x^2-9)+3sin^(-1)(3/x)+c which is apparently wrong because when I take the derivative of it I don't get the integrand
my work is a attachment in this post
wolfram alpha claims the answer is
sqrt(x^2-9)+3tan^(-1)(3/sqrt(x^2-9))
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+sqrt%28x^2-9%29%2Fx+dx

I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, i think i am doing something wrong becasue when I take the derivative I don't get the integrand but I don't see what I'm doing wrong

thanks for any help
 

Attachments

  • Scan.jpg
    Scan.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 845
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, why are you torturing yourself? I get the feeling you LIKE trig substitution.
Okay, now, I don't follow your work. Why do you have the integral initial and then it's suddenly equal to integral cos? Since you seem to use csc again (glutton for punishment...) the only two functions I woulod expect to see are csc and cot, as we learned we could do yesterday. So, I don't get the first step.
 
Also, why not start to learn the Latex?
First type [ tex ] with no spaces between the brackets and the word tex. Then, \sqrt{everything in the sqrt} for squirts, and \frac{top half}{bottom half} notice no slashy bar in between top and bottom. Go on and try it :) and then [ /tex ] no space to end the code. and \int for integral I think. Might want to look that one up. (I'm new too!)
 
Notice from your triangle that θ may be expressed in many different ways.

Besides θ = sin-1(3/x), you could have any of the following & more:
θ = csc-1(x/3)

θ = tan-1(3/√(x2-9))

...​
 
Oh geez. That's what you get for using unconventional trig subs :P
My calculator has the BEST feature, I can put in two things and ask if they are equal. Saves me a lot of this kind of situation because the first thing I do when I don't get what the book has is ask if it's equal. :)
 
Lol I don't like learning new things and don't want to use Latex I guess idk lol to lazy much rather just scan my paper, much less work...

I don't like trig substitution but I'm trying to learn it, it's the section I'm working on at the moment in my textbook

My first step... notice my triangle on the left

cosine(theta)=adjacent/hypotenuse=sqrt(x^2-9)/x
hence i can change the integrand to cosine(theta) dx... of course it's in terms of dx so I have to change that which I did by using the fact that
sine(theta)=opposite/hypotenuse=3/x

I then solved for x and got

x= 3csc(theta)

I then took the derrivative of this and got
dx/dtheta = -3csc(theta)cot(theta)
hence
dx = -3csc(theta)cot(theta) dtheta

I then plugged this back into my integral

integral cosine(theta) dx = -3*integral[ cos(theta)csc(theta)cot(theta) dtheta]

i then evaluated this integral

-3[-theta -cot(theta)]
if you look at my triangle cot(theta)=adjacent/opposite=sqrt(x^2-9)/3
for theta I again used sin(theta)=3/x
hence
theta=sin^(-1)(3/x)

hence i got this for my answer
-3[-theta -cot(theta)] = 3sin^(-1)(3/x) + sqrt(x^2-9) + c

note that the 3 canceled out from the second term

like this makes perfect logic that would not to seem to be flawed and the intermediate steps in between are correct, at least appear to be, unless I'm doing something wrong like mixing up stupid trig identities because it's been so many years sense I originally learned them but I think I got everything correct and that my answer should be right... the only problem is that when i take the derivative of my answer I don't get the integrand =(
 
ya wait so is my answer correct? or am i doing something wrong because I don't really see what, and you i noticed that but

d/dx(3 sin^(-1)(3/x)+sqrt(x^2-9)) = x/sqrt(x^2-9)-9/(sqrt(1-9/x^2) x^2)

hence i think i may be doing something wrong
 
YES! It's correct !
 
Yeah I see the first step now. Thanks for spelling it out for me :)

Yes, your answer is correct. See if what you get when you differentiate might be equivalent to what you started with.
 
  • #10
x/sqrt(x^2-9)-9/(sqrt(1-9/x^2) x^2) = sqrt(x^2-9)/x
ha i didn't know that
guess my answer is right and yay we can use cosine substitutions ^_^
 
  • #11
Are you going to try hyperbolic substitution tomorrow? Because if you come back with sinh@ I swear I will not help you... :P

EDIT (You must forgive my sarcasm. I have an exam tomorrow and the prof lectured for two hours today and didn't take questions. I always tweak out before exams.)

But one more sarcasm :)

guess my answer is right and yay we can use cosine substitutions ^_^

yay.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
ArcanaNoir said:
Are you going to try hyperbolic substitution tomorrow? Because if you come back with sinh@ I swear I will not help you... :P
hmmm... let me think about it... i don't think you can? Can you O.o? I haven't studied the hyperbolic trigonometric functions yet =(, at least not enough detail to make any substitutions, but I thought there was no traditional way to define them with regards to sides of triangles like the rest of the trigonometric functions in terms of opposite, adjacent, hypotenuse? It would be interesting how that would turn out... or better yet :P I wounder for we can make a cis(theta) substitution >_<, i have done stuff like finding the exact answer of cos^(-1)(5/7) and stuff and had to learn how to use cis(theta)... hmm I don't think it would work... ha I bet you could ^_^ because cis(x)=cos(x)+isin(x) you would just have to divide by i if you had something like... hmm i don't know ^_^ but my thoughts are racing i want to see if you can... but you so there's no convient way to define the hyperbolic functions in terms of sides of a triangle nor by using the cis function sense

cosh(x)=(e^x+e^(-x))/2 as oppose to cos(x)=(e^(ix)+e^(-ix))/2

hmmm i don't know?
 
  • #13
ArcanaNoir said:
Are you going to try hyperbolic substitution tomorrow? Because if you come back with sinh@ I swear I will not help you... :P

EDIT (You must forgive my sarcasm. I have an exam tomorrow and the prof lectured for two hours today and didn't take questions. I always tweak out before exams.)

But one more sarcasm :)



yay.

caffeine pills do the trick for me ^_^ take like two and you will be up all night and will get lots of studying done lol, one pill = two cups of coffee lolz
 
  • #14
Yes, you can use cosine substitutions.

Substitutions using hyperbolic trig functions is a very powerful integration technique.
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
Yes, you can use cosine substitutions.

Substitutions using hyperbolic trig functions is a very powerful integration technique.

Could you give a example of a case in which one can use hyperbolic trig substitution?

Also I imagine anything that can use a cis(theta) substitution can just be broken up into two separate integrals and evaluated separately.
 
  • #16
could i just get like a example
 
  • #17
anyone?
 
  • #18
I found this, and many others, by googling "hyperbolic substitution integral":
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Mathematics/geomath/level2/fint/fi2b.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K