Calculus of variation textbook 'not under a single integral'

dIndy
I have to find functions that maximise certain criterea. The problem can however not be put "under a single integral", for example I've to find ##f(t)##, ##g(t)## that maximise:

##
\int_0^{t_e}f(t)^2dt\int_0^{t_e}g(t)^2dt - (\int_0^{t_e}f(t)g(t)dt)^2
##

With ## -1 \leq f(t)\leq1## and ## -1 \leq g(t)\leq 1## for all t

For this problem I can still intuitively guess a solution, such as: ## f(t)=1## for all t and ## g(t)=1## until ##0.5t_e##, afterwards ## g(t)=-1##.

But for more complicated problems I'll no longer be able to guess the solution and will need a proper way to find a solution. Most calculus of variations textbooks I've consulted (such as Gelfand) focus on problems that can be solved with the Euler-Lagrange equation, which I do not think can be applied here?

Does anybody know a textbook that covers these type of problems, or even a keyword that describes these kind of problems? Searching for calculus of variations did not get me far. I come from a life sciences background, so sadly my ability to read something much more complicated than the textbook by Gelfand is limited, but any recommendation is appreciated, thanks!
 
on Phys.org
dIndy said:
or even a keyword that describes these kind of problems?

For that particular problem: "Orthogonal basis functions".

Assume ##f(x) = \sum_{i=1}^n a_i p_i(x) ## where the ##a_i## are unknown constants and the ##p_i(x)## are as set of orthogonal basis functions. Assume ##g(x) = \sum_{i=1}^n b_i p_i(x)## where the ##b_i## are unknown constants.
Look at the restrictions that the given equation places on ##a_i## and ##b_i##.

It isn't clear what you mean by "more complicated problems". The general description "Problems of finding the extrema of functions who arguments are unknown functions" seems too vague to pick out a specific branch of mathematics.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
For that particular problem: "Orthogonal basis functions".
Thanks, this concept might be quite useful, I did some searching and the solution I guessed in the opening post seems to be a Walsh function. The problem in my opening post was also equivalent to maximising the determinant:

##\det{\begin{vmatrix}\int f(t)^2dt&\int f(t)g(t)dt\\
\int f(t)g(t)dt&\int g(t)^2dt\end{vmatrix}}##

A more difficult problem then could be maximising:

##\det{\begin{vmatrix}\int f(t)^2dt&\int f(t)g(t)dt&\int f(t)g(t)^2dt \\
&\int g(t)^2dt&\int g(t)^3dt\\
& & \int g(t)^4dt\end{vmatrix}}##

Where it would then be ideal if ##f## was not only orthogonal to ##g## but also to ##g^2##, and ##g## to ##g^2##?

Another problem could be when the determinant explicitly depends on ##t##:

##\det{\begin{vmatrix}\int f(t)^2dt&\int f(t)^2tdt\\
&\int f(t)^2t^2dt \end{vmatrix}}##

But I do not want to turn this thread into a homework one for solving these specific problems.

What I was originally looking for was a book that describes methods for turning problems like mine into differential equations (I do not know if this is even possible), similar to how in calculus of variation books maximising ##\int_a^b L(y,y',t)dt## turns into the Euler-Lagrange equation. But then a text for problems that could not be neatly written as a Lagrangian under an integral.
 
dIndy said:
Where it would then be ideal if ##f## was not only orthogonal to ##g## but also to ##g^2##, and ##g## to ##g^2##?

The idea isn't to make ##f##, ##g##, ##g^2## orthogonal, but rather to parameterize the problem by expressing the functions as sums of orthogonal functions. (Of course, it may turn out that answers to particular problems do indeed require that ##f## and ##g## be orthogonal to each other.)

For example, if ##f(x) = a_1 p_1(x) + a_2 p_2(x) ## and ##g(x) = b_1 p_1(x) + b_2 p_2(x)## where the ##p_i## are orthogonal and also orthonormal functions on the set (or interval) ##S## then:

##\int_S f(x)g(x)dx = ##
##a_1 b_1 \int_S p_1(x)p_1(x) + a_1 b_2 \int_S p_1(x)p_2(x) + a_2 b_1 p_2(x) p_1(x) + a_2 b_2 \int_S p_2(x) p_2(x) ##
## = a_1 b_1 + 0 + 0 + a_2 b_2 ##

and

##\int_S g^2(x) dx = ##
## \int_S b_1 b_1 \int_S p_1(x) p_1(x) + 2 b_1 b_2 \int_S p_1(x) p_2(x) + b_2 b_2 \int_S p_2(x)p_2(x) ##
## = b_1^2 + 0 + b_2^2 ##

So all the calculus is gone and what's left is algebraic expressions in the unknowns ##a_i, b_i##.
 
dIndy said:
What I was originally looking for was a book that describes methods for turning problems like mine into differential equations (I do not know if this is even possible), similar to how in calculus of variation books maximising ##\int_a^b L(y,y',t)dt## turns into the Euler-Lagrange equation

We could think about that.

My recollection of the calculus of variations is that one defines a "variation" of the unknown solution ##f(x) ## to be the function ##\delta f = f(x) + \alpha v(x)## where ##\alpha## is a "small" constant and ##v(x)## is an arbitrary differentiable function that is 0 at x = a and x = b. The manipulations used in the calculus of variations arrive at a differential equation for ##f(x)## that does not depend on the specific choice of ##v(x)##. So we'd have to understand what conditions in a more general problem would lead to equations independent of the choice of ##v(x)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K