Calculus problem, explaining the step

  • Thread starter Thread starter karnten07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a calculus problem involving the second derivative and the manipulation of expressions involving limits as dx approaches zero. Participants are exploring the relationship between first and second derivatives through the use of difference quotients.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how the expression dy/dx(x+dx) - dy/dx(x-dx) relates to the second derivative as dx approaches zero. There are discussions about the necessity of dividing by dx or 2h to clarify the transition to a second derivative.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing insights into the definition of derivatives and the importance of taking limits, while others express confusion about the implications of these manipulations. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the transition from first to second derivatives, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential misunderstandings regarding the limit process and the definition of derivatives, as well as the implications of substituting specific values for h. Participants are navigating through these concepts without a complete resolution.

karnten07
Messages
206
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


dy/dx(x+dx) - dy/dx(x-dx)
=> d^2y/dx^2 when dx->0

can someone explain this step to me please?



Homework Equations



The dx in the brackets should be sigma x

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that dx -> means it tends to zero

i think i might have missed something out that might make a difference to this step;
it may be necessary to divide through the first line by dx (sigma x) to complete the step? I am stumped, i don't see how this works at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Write h for 'dx' in 'brackets'. Then you are saying lim h->0 y'(x+h)-y'(x-h)=y''(x). Not true. It's ok if you divide the left side by 2*h. It's just a difference quotient representation of a derivative.
 
Dick said:
Write h for 'dx' in 'brackets'. Then you are saying lim h->0 y'(x+h)-y'(x-h)=y''(x). Not true. It's ok if you divide the left side by 2*h. It's just a difference quotient representation of a derivative.

Yes, my notes show that i divide the left hand side by h, but i still don't understand how this makes the left hand side into a 2nd order derivative?
 
The derivative of f(x) can be defined by the limit of f(x+h)-f(x-h)/(2h) (yes, 2h). Put f=y and you get a definition of derivative y'. Now put f=y'.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
The derivative of f(x) can be defined by the limit of f(x+h)-f(x-h)/(2h) (yes, 2h). Put f=y and you get a definition of derivative y'. Now put f=y'.


say h = 0.1, and i put f=y', i would get (1.1 - 0.9)/0.2 = 1
how does this mean that it equals f''?
 
You said "I know that dx -> means it tends to zero". You have to take the limit as h->0 to get the true derivative.
 
Dick said:
You said "I know that dx -> means it tends to zero". You have to take the limit as h->0 to get the true derivative.


I see, I am sorry if I am missing an obvious point here, but i still can't see how as h tends to zero it makes the formula become a second derivative.

I chose 0.1 because it was a relatively low number to see if i could understand the workings of the equivalence we are studying. So as h gets smaller and smaller i still get the answer of 1, and when h is zero i get:

(f'x - f'x)/0

which equals zero - OOOOOOOHHHHH - and that is what it equals as a second derivative! I didnt realize that, but i see how that works now, i think. Thankyou Dick, i got there in the end i guess.
 
Don't put h=0! The result is undefined! Take the limit as h->0. Look back at the definition of a 'derivative'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K