Calculus problem with directional vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter jgreene2313
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Vectors
jgreene2313
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
At the point (2,-1,2) on the surface z = x(y^2), find the direction vector for the direction of greatest decrease of z.

A) i - 2j
B) i - 4j
C) (i - 4j)/sqrt(17)
D) -i + 4j
E) i + j

Do I need a function f(x,y,z)? If so then f(x,y,z) = z = xy^2.

Then the gradient vector would be <Fx, Fy, Fz>.

This would be give me. < -y^2, -2xy, 1>

At the point (2,-1,2) we get < -1, 4, 1>

But how do i get the direction of the vector of greatest decrease?

From the choices though it seems they only find the gradient vector of z = F(x,y) = xy^2

In which case the gradient vector is < fx, fy>

< y^2 , 2xy> .
At the point (2, -1 ,2) we get < 1, -4>
Again i am not sure how to find the vector of greatest decrease.

It says in my book the direction of minimum increase is - norm( grad f(x,y,z)). But i am not getting any of these answers can some one help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jgreene2313 said:
At the point (2,-1,2) on the surface z = x(y^2), find the direction vector for the direction of greatest decrease of z.

A) i - 2j
B) i - 4j
C) (i - 4j)/sqrt(17)
D) -i + 4j
E) i + j

Do I need a function f(x,y,z)? If so then f(x,y,z) = z = xy^2.
No, it's z=f(x,y). You're given a function from R2 to R, not R3 to R.
Then the gradient vector would be <Fx, Fy, Fz>.

This would be give me. < -y^2, -2xy, 1>

At the point (2,-1,2) we get < -1, 4, 1>

But how do i get the direction of the vector of greatest decrease?

From the choices though it seems they only find the gradient vector of z = F(x,y) = xy^2

In which case the gradient vector is < fx, fy>

< y^2 , 2xy> .
At the point (2, -1 ,2) we get < 1, -4>.

Again i am not sure how to find the vector of greatest decrease.

It says in my book the direction of minimum increase is - norm( grad f(x,y,z)). But i am not getting any of these answers can someone help?
I doubt your book says that. The norm of the gradient is a number, not a vector; it doesn't have a direction.

How are the gradient and the rate and direction of maximum increase related?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top