Calorimetry Help: Solving a Problem with Ice Phase Change

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsinCalifornia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calorimeter
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the final temperature after mixing 250 mL of coffee at 80 degrees C with 250 g of ice at 0 degrees C, it’s essential to consider the heat transfer involved in the phase change of ice. The heat of fusion for ice is 6.01 kJ/mol, indicating that this amount of energy is required to melt 1 mol of ice at 0 degrees C into water at the same temperature. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing work for clarity in problem-solving. Participants encourage providing details of any calculations already attempted to facilitate further assistance. Understanding the heat transfer dynamics is crucial for determining the final temperature accurately.
PhysicsinCalifornia
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
I needed to know if anyone can help me solve a problem.

I am supposed to calculate the final temperature after mixing 250 mL of coffee at 80 degrees C with 250 g of ice at 0 degrees C.

The heat of fusion for ice is 6.01 kJ/mol

The ice undergoes a phase change, but I don't know how to apply it. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the heat of fusion says it all. It is 6.01 kJ/mol. That means that it takes 6.01 kJ of heat to melt 1 mol of ice--that is changing 1 mol of ice at 0 degrees C to 1 mol of water at 0 degrees C.

Technically you're supposed to show some work before you can get help here, so if you need more help please post to what extent you've worked the problem out so far.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top