Can 7Li Replace Na in Fast Breeder Reactors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Efrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    breeder
AI Thread Summary
7Li can be utilized as a coolant alternative to sodium in fast breeder reactors, especially in high-temperature compact designs, with potassium Rankine or Brayton cycles for power conversion. The primary advantage of 7Li is its ability to minimize downtime and repair costs in the event of leaks, as the system can quickly purge the heat exchanger and continue operation with gas. However, the high cost of 7Li and the lack of operational enrichment facilities for Li-7 present significant challenges. The presence of Li-6 would negatively impact reactor neutronics, making it unsuitable for use. Overall, while 7Li offers benefits, its practical implementation faces hurdles that need to be addressed.
Efrain
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
7Li can be used instead on Na on a fast breeder reactor?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Efrain said:
7Li can be used instead on Na on a fast breeder reactor?
Yes - particularly for very high temperature compact fast reactors. A potassium Rankine cycle or Brayton cycle would then be used for power conversion.
 
Thank you Astronuc for your answer. Even when the 7Li is more expensive I see a lot of advantages over sodium.

For me the greatest advantage is that if a leak occurs on a nuclear-gas brayton turbine configuration, the compressed air can be bypassed from the heat exchanger to the combustion chamber, the reactor can be shut down, the leaked heat exchanger can be purged very fast with nitrogen or argon and the turbine continue working with gas which means very little plant downtime and less costly repairs.

After material cost issues, what will be the drawbacks for using 7Li instead Na on fast breeder reactors?
 
Last edited:
As of now, there are no enrichment facilities operating for Li7 enrichment. Li6 would kill the neutronics of any operating reactor.

The MSRE used Li7 left over from the weapons production (did they want Li6 or Li7 for weapons?); however, no such facility operates today; as far as I know.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top