Can 7Li Replace Na in Fast Breeder Reactors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Efrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    breeder
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

7Li can effectively replace Na in fast breeder reactors, particularly in high-temperature compact designs. Utilizing a potassium Rankine cycle or Brayton cycle for power conversion enhances operational efficiency. The primary advantage of 7Li is its ability to minimize downtime and repair costs in the event of a leak, as the reactor can be quickly purged and shut down without significant disruption. However, the lack of operational enrichment facilities for Li7 presents a significant drawback, as Li6 negatively impacts reactor neutronics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fast breeder reactor technology
  • Knowledge of Brayton and Rankine thermodynamic cycles
  • Familiarity with nuclear fuel enrichment processes
  • Insight into reactor safety protocols and leak management
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational principles of potassium Rankine and Brayton cycles
  • Investigate the current status of lithium enrichment facilities and their capabilities
  • Explore the implications of using Li6 versus Li7 in nuclear reactors
  • Study the safety measures and protocols for managing leaks in nuclear systems
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor designers, and safety analysts interested in advanced reactor technologies and materials optimization.

Efrain
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
7Li can be used instead on Na on a fast breeder reactor?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Efrain said:
7Li can be used instead on Na on a fast breeder reactor?
Yes - particularly for very high temperature compact fast reactors. A potassium Rankine cycle or Brayton cycle would then be used for power conversion.
 
Thank you Astronuc for your answer. Even when the 7Li is more expensive I see a lot of advantages over sodium.

For me the greatest advantage is that if a leak occurs on a nuclear-gas brayton turbine configuration, the compressed air can be bypassed from the heat exchanger to the combustion chamber, the reactor can be shut down, the leaked heat exchanger can be purged very fast with nitrogen or argon and the turbine continue working with gas which means very little plant downtime and less costly repairs.

After material cost issues, what will be the drawbacks for using 7Li instead Na on fast breeder reactors?
 
Last edited:
As of now, there are no enrichment facilities operating for Li7 enrichment. Li6 would kill the neutronics of any operating reactor.

The MSRE used Li7 left over from the weapons production (did they want Li6 or Li7 for weapons?); however, no such facility operates today; as far as I know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K