Can a Black Hole Self-Destruct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcgldr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential for black holes to self-destruct, primarily through the conversion of matter into energy, which does not alter gravitational pull. It raises questions about the nature of dark matter and its possible anti-gravitational effects, as well as the relationship between mass accumulation, spin, and gravitational forces. Participants clarify that within a black hole's Schwarzschild radius, inertial forces from rotation do not counteract gravitational attraction but rather enhance it. The concept of the photon sphere is introduced, indicating a critical radius where the dynamics of angular momentum affect gravitational forces. Overall, the conversation delves into complex gravitational interactions and the fundamental properties of black holes.
rcgldr
Homework Helper
Messages
8,923
Reaction score
675
Curious about this. One possiblity is that matter in the black hole would be converted into energy, which might reduce the gravitational pull. Would it be possible that "dark matter' is created with anti-gravitational effects? Or maybe if enough mass is accumulated, combined with a high rate of spin, that the outer matter would pull the black hole appart?

Another issue I don't understand is that I've read that gravity in a black hole is stronger than the strong force. I had the impression that the closer the objects, the more dominate the strong force would be.

Last question, why isn't the nucleus of an atom like a mini-black hole? How closely packed are these?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Jeff Reid said:
Curious about this. One possiblity is that matter in the black hole would be converted into energy, which might reduce the gravitational pull.

The gravitational pull is related to the total energy, which includes matter. Converting matter into energy or vice versa would NOT change the gravitational pull in any way.

Jeff Reid said:
....Or maybe if enough mass is accumulated, combined with a high rate of spin, that the outer matter would pull the black hole appart?......

You're thinking that the inertial force associated with rotation would counter the gravitational attaction. However, inside the Schwarzschild radius this force is directed inwardly, not outwardly.

:biggrin:
 
mijoon said:
The gravitational pull is related to the total energy, which includes matter. Converting matter into energy or vice versa would NOT change the gravitational pull in any way.
You're thinking that the inertial force associated with rotation would counter the gravitational attaction. However, inside the Schwarzschild radius this force is directed inwardly, not outwardly.

:biggrin:

Yep - actually the break-point is at r=3M, which is the photon sphere.

If you take the effective potiential
http://www.fourmilab.ch/gravitation/orbits/

<br /> V=\sqrt{(1-\frac{2M}{r})(1+L^2/r^2)<br />

and take the "force" as the rate of change of the effective potential with radius, i.e. F=dV/dr, you find that the force is equal to

<br /> \frac{M + (3M-r)\frac{L^2}{r^2}} {\sqrt{r(r-2M)(r^2+L^2)}}<br />

Here M is the mass of the black hole (in geometric units), r is your schwarzschild radial coordinate, and L is your angular momentum.

Focusing on the numerator and Ingoring the denominator, you can thus see that the "sign" of the contribution of angular momentum, L, to the total force changes character at r=3M. Outside the photon sphere, having L>0 reduces the force. Inside the sphere, having L>0 actually _increases_ the force!This is actually consrervative - at the photon sphere itself, there is no change in force due to L in the numerator, but it's clear that increase L always increases the denominator, thus even at the photon sphere (r=3M), increasing L decreases the force.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top