Can a Fourier series be adjusted to model a decreasing period function?

flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
I have a function I want to model. It is periodic, but the period keeps decreasing. Basically, it'll be a periodic function "squished" for larger values of x.

The typical Fourier series is...
y = SUM{aSin(nx)} + SUM{bCos(nx)}

I think I will attempt

y = SUM{aSin(nx^2)} + SUM{bCos(nx^2)}

replacing x -->x^2 should give me the "smushing" that I want.

The application is bladder level as a function of beers consumed. The basic function is an increasing (quadratic, exponential) function followed by a linear, steeply sloped drop to zero.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I guess you should worry the amplitude as well. Your general function is ##f(t) = A(t)\sin(p(t)+p_0)##. Now you can try some functions for ##A(t)## and ##p(t)##. I would let WolframAlpha do the graphics until I'm satisfied.
 
sounds like you need a wavelet transform, not a Fourier transform
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top