Can a Heat Pump and Stirling Engine Create a Perpetual Energy Cycle?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating a perpetual energy cycle using a heat pump and a Stirling engine. Participants explore the theoretical implications of energy transfer, efficiency, and thermodynamic principles, particularly focusing on the coefficient of performance (COP) of heat pumps and the efficiency of Stirling engines.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a process where a heat pump with a 400% COP is used to supply heat to a Stirling engine, which operates at 32% efficiency, suggesting that this could produce more energy than consumed.
  • Another participant counters that the idea suggests an 'over unity device' and highlights that the efficiency of heat engines depends on the temperature difference between hot and cold sources, questioning the feasibility of the proposed efficiencies.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the original claim, noting that the extra energy mentioned by the OP comes from the surroundings, which may not align with thermodynamic laws.
  • It is noted that the COP of a heat pump increases with a smaller temperature difference, while the efficiency of a Stirling engine decreases under the same conditions, suggesting that the proposed efficiencies may not hold true.
  • One participant asserts that the concept violates the second law of thermodynamics, categorizing it as a perpetual motion machine.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to verify the temperature conditions corresponding to the efficiency figures used in the calculations, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the underlying principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of the proposed energy cycle, with some asserting it is impossible due to thermodynamic laws, while others explore the theoretical aspects without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions made about efficiency figures and the temperature differences required for the heat pump and Stirling engine. There is an acknowledgment that the calculations may not be valid without proper context regarding these parameters.

Devin-M
Messages
1,076
Reaction score
765
I was reading about heat pumps and it made me wonder… would the following process be physically possible…?

I attach the hot side of the heat pump to the hot side of the stirling engine. 400% COP (coefficient of performance) means 1 kilowatt hour of electricity consumed by the heat pump delivers 4 kilowatt hours of heat to the stirling engine (heat mostly transferred from the environment to the stirling engine, rather than the electricity itself being directly converted to heat).

BGE_HeatPumps_04.jpg
1-.png


…the stirling engine operates at 32% efficiency… for every 4 kilowatt hours of heat supplied, 1.28 kilowatt hours of mechanical energy is generated. the mechanical output of the stirling engine is attached to a generator…
DC-GENERATOR-WORKING.jpg
the generator operates at 95% efficiency… for every 1.28 kilowatt hours of mechanical energy supplied, 1.21 kilowatt hours of electrical power is produced. the electrical power is used to charge a battery…
image-20150517-25415-1580vfu.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.png
… the battery charges at 95% efficiency… for every 1.21 kilowatt hours supplied, 1.15 kilowatt hours of energy is stored. 1.15 kilowatt hours of stored electricity has been produced from 1 kilowatt hour of electricity input. the extra energy obtained came from the heat energy of the surroundings which have now decreased in temperature as a result of the process.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Devin-M said:
I was reading about heat pumps and it made me wonder… would the following process be physically possible…?
There is no such thing as a free lunch. What you are suggesting is an 'over unity device' which you feel should deliver more than you put in. PF doesn't discuss this concept or perpetual motion machines because the idea is fundamentally flawed.
The easiest way to destroy your idea is to tell you that the efficiency of a heat engine of any sort depends upon the temperature difference between the hot source and cold sink of heat. Your statement of the efficiency of the Stirling assumes a temperature difference that a refrigeration unit (driven by the sterling engine) couldn't produce. Your efficiency figures have no foundation so the results of your sums are not feasible.
I think this thread will have a short life, once the mods see it. My post may not even make it on board!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and russ_watters
sophiecentaur said:
There is no such thing as a free lunch. What you are suggesting is an 'over unity device'
I'm not sure that's correct (but I'm no expert in thermo). The OP says this at the end of his post:

Devin-M said:
the extra energy obtained came from the heat energy of the surroundings which have now decreased in temperature as a result of the process.
 
Devin-M said:
heat energy of the surroundings which have now decreased in temperature as a result of the process.
"Possible?" Yes. Why?
 
The COP of a heat pump increases as the temperature difference decreases. The efficiency of a Stirling (or any heat) engine decreases as the temperature difference decreases. The temperature difference of a heat pump at 400% COP, when applied to a Stirling engine, will result in engine efficiency closer to 2% than to 32%.

Some good sources on Stirling engine efficiency:
Search Stirling engine efficiency
Stirling Engine Design and Feasibility for Automotive Use, edited by M.J. Collie, Noyes Data Corporation, 1979
Air Engines - The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine, by Finklestein and Organ, ASME, 2001
Stirling Engines, by G. Walker, Clarendon Press, 1980

A search using search terms heat pump efficiency will bring up good information on how the efficiency (COP) varies with temperature difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur, BvU and russ_watters
berkeman said:
I'm not sure that's correct (but I'm no expert in thermo). The OP says this at the end of his post:
That would violate the 2nd law of thermo.

This is a perpetual motion machine, and @jrmdescribed why it won't work. Thread locked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Devin-M said:
I was reading about heat pumps and it made me wonder… would the following process be physically possible…?
No. That would violate the second law of thermodynamics.

Devin-M said:
400% COP (coefficient of performance) means 1 kilowatt hour of electricity consumed by the heat pump delivers 4 kilowatt hours of heat … …the stirling engine operates at 32% efficiency… for every 4 kilowatt hours of heat supplied, 1.28 kilowatt hours of mechanical energy is generated.
The COP of a heat pump and the efficiency of a heat engine both depend strongly on the temperatures of the hot and cold reservoirs. For this calculation you need to go back and check the sources for the temperatures corresponding to each of these numbers. You will find that the Stirling engine numbers are for a much bigger temperature difference than the heat pump numbers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K