To you maybe, but not to many well-respected physicists. It just requires the notion that our 3d space is not fundamental to the particle but part of an observer's representation of particles (just like temperature of a macroscopic system is a representation of the energy of constituent particles). This has been a growing idea for the last couple of decades. Check out, for example,secur said:Another complication is that some physicists are willing to consider it actually 0-dimensional, and yet (somehow) existing anyway. IMO that's just pseudo-science.
A point-like particle dimension refers to the size or extent of a particle that is so small it can be considered infinitesimal, or having no physical size or volume. In other words, it is a particle with no measurable dimensions.
A point-like particle is different from other particles in that it has no physical size or volume, whereas other particles such as atoms or molecules have measurable dimensions. Point-like particles are also considered to be fundamental, meaning they cannot be broken down into smaller components.
Point-like particles play a crucial role in physics as they are used to describe the behavior and interactions of subatomic particles, such as electrons and quarks. They are also a key concept in theories such as quantum mechanics and particle physics.
No, point-like particles cannot be observed or measured directly due to their infinitesimal size. However, their effects and interactions can be observed and measured through experiments and calculations using principles of quantum mechanics and particle physics.
The concept of point-like particles is widely accepted in the scientific community and has been supported by numerous experiments and observations. However, some theories such as string theory propose that particles may have a small but finite size, challenging the idea of point-like particles. Further research and experimentation are necessary to fully understand the nature of particles and their dimensions.