Can a Positively Charged Insulating Rod Charge Two Metal Spheres Differently?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nns91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Insulator
AI Thread Summary
A positively charged insulating rod can charge a metal sphere positively through direct contact, transferring some of its charge. However, it cannot simultaneously charge one sphere positively and another negatively without being recharged, as the insulating rod does not allow free movement of charges. The concept of charging by induction suggests that a charged object can influence the distribution of charges in a nearby conductor, but this method requires separation of charges rather than direct contact. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the mechanics of charging and the role of insulating materials. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately answering the posed questions.
nns91
Messages
301
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Expalin how a positively charged insulating rod can be used to give a metal sphere a positive charge. Cam the same rod be used to simultaneously give one sphere a psotive charge and another sphere a negative charge without the rod having to be recharged ??

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



So I said charge a ball with contact by using the rod. Then, that ball will be - charged. Use the ball to charge the other ball by contact then we have a + charged ball ? Is it true ?

How about the second part, I am not really sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An insulating rod has no charges that are free to move around, so exactly how can it be used to give a metal sphere a positive charge? What do you know about charging by induction?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top