Can a rectangle have a negative area?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Negative
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Don't need help solving just have a question about the question

Rectangle ABCD has vertices C and d on the x-axis and vertices A and B on part of the parabola y = 9 - x^2 that is above the x-axis.

a.) Find the coordinates of A, B, C, and D in terms of x.
b.) Determine the Area of the rectangle as a function of x.
c.) What is the domain for the area function? Hint: Area cannot be negative

well I'm completley lost here on how to do this
also for c. technically speaking can area be negative area is a tensor a magnitude with more then one direciton no? So an area can be negative it would just be in the set of complex numbers no? So yah I'm not buying "area cannot be negative" I'm sure that it can be no? I'm just unsure in this situation becaues this situation refers to a rectangle withing a parabola but still negative area is possible... please I'd like to know the truth, i.e. in real life there is no such thing but in math there is, much like how you are told lies that cos(x)=-2 has no solution until you find out later it does it's just not in the domain of reals, is this the same case as here, i.e. here the problem is lieing to me as there is such a thing it's just has no application in the real number system or something, lol I'm sure that there is such thing as negative area but it's been so long sense I took calc lol I remeber it coming up and there was such a thing no?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
GreenPrint said:

Homework Statement


Don't need help solving just have a question about the question

Rectangle ABCD has vertices C and d on the x-axis and vertices A and B on part of the parabola y = 9 - x^2 that is above the x-axis.

a.) Find the coordinates of A, B, C, and D in terms of x.
b.) Determine the Area of the rectangle as a function of x.
c.) What is the domain for the area function? Hint: Area cannot be negative

well I'm completley lost here on how to do this
also for c. technically speaking can area be negative area is a tensor a magnitude with more then one direciton no?
No, area can't be negative. It's a two-dimensional quantity.
GreenPrint said:
So an area can be negative it would just be in the set of complex numbers no? So yah I'm not buying "area cannot be negative" I'm sure that it can be no? I'm just unsure in this situation becaues this situation refers to a rectangle withing a parabola but still negative area is possible.
No.
GreenPrint said:
.. please I'd like to know the truth, i.e. in real life there is no such thing but in math there is, much like how you are told lies that cos(x)=-2 has no solution until you find out later it does it's just not in the domain of reals, is this the same case as here, i.e. here the problem is lieing to me as there is such a thing it's just has no application in the real number system or something, lol I'm sure that there is such thing as negative area but it's been so long sense I took calc lol I remeber it coming up and there was such a thing no?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
The only time negative area came up in calculus was when integrating in some domain of a function which was under the x-axis.

For example, \int^3_{-3}(9-x^2)dx=36 u^2 and obviously -\int^3_{-3}(9-x^2)dx=-36u^2 but this is equivalent to \int^3_{-3}-(9-x^2)dx=\int^3_{-3}(x^2-9)dx
 
Thanks!
 
Mentallic said:
The only time negative area came up in calculus was when integrating in some domain of a function which was under the x-axis.
If the integral that represents area is set up correctly, you won't get a negative value.
Mentallic said:
For example, \int^3_{-3}(9-x^2)dx=36 u^2 and obviously -\int^3_{-3}(9-x^2)dx=-36u^2 but this is equivalent to \int^3_{-3}-(9-x^2)dx=\int^3_{-3}(x^2-9)dx
If you want to calculate the area between the graph of y = x2 - 9 and the x-axis, the integral should look like this:
\int^3_{-3} 0 - (x^2 - 9)dx = \int_{-3}^3 -x^2 + 9~dx = +36

When you set up the integral, the height of the typical area element is ytop - ybottom, or 0 - (x2 - 9), which can be written more simply as -x2 + 9. This gives you a positive value for the height. The other dimension of the typical area element is \Delta x, which is already positive.

BTW, \int^3_{-3}(9-x^2)dx \neq 36 u^2
Where did the u2 come from?
 
Mark44 said:
If the integral that represents area is set up correctly, you won't get a negative value.
Yes, but I chose not to be picky because of...
GreenPrint said:
lol I'm sure that there is such thing as negative area but it's been so long sense I took calc lol I remeber it coming up and there was such a thing no?
...and just explain where he could've possibly seen negative area. Many teachers also teach their students to just take the absolute value of the integral as the easy way out.


Mark44 said:
BTW, \int^3_{-3}(9-x^2)dx \neq 36 u^2
Where did the u2 come from?
The u represents units and is not a variable. Also another common thing to do (back in my class at least) when dealing with integrals that represent areas.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top