Can a small black hole exist inside a larger black hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of a mini black hole existing within a larger black hole and the implications of such a scenario. It raises questions about the observability of the mini black hole's evolution in terms of mass, angular momentum, and charge, particularly whether it could disappear without detection from outside the larger black hole. Participants note that general relativity allows for black holes to collide and merge, suggesting that a small black hole could indeed fall into a larger one, potentially leading to dynamic interactions. However, some argue that the Schwarzschild metric, which describes a black hole's static nature, complicates the idea of a mini black hole remaining meaningful inside a larger one. The conversation highlights the need for further mathematical clarity and resources to explore these concepts in depth.
kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
Can a mini black hole exist as a black hole, inside a black hole of a few solar masses? If so,would this mean that we would not only be ignorant of the evolution of the microstates of the mini black hole as time passes - we would also be ignorant of the evolution of the total mass, angular momentum and charge of the mini black hole - can a mini black hole disappear without trace
from observers outside a large black hole?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
kurious said:
Can a mini black hole exist as a black hole, inside a black hole of a few solar masses? If so,would this mean that we would not only be ignorant of the evolution of the microstates of the mini black hole as time passes - we would also be ignorant of the evolution of the total mass, angular momentum and charge of the mini black hole - can a mini black hole disappear without trace
from observers outside a large black hole?

a partial answer:
the ordinary GR theory in which black holes were first predicted
allows black holes to collide and merge

and people do numerical GR simulations of that kind of thing on computers
on the web you can see comic strip sequences of computergenerated pictgures of black holes colliding

I don't see any reason a little BH couldn't fall into a big one, and because of timedilation troubles we on the outside might not actually be able to see it fall thru the horizon

but in "reality" whatever that means the little black hole would exist inside the big one and, I guess, be succcckkkked into the center of the big one and slurped. And I guess the computer people could easily simulate that and crank out pictures of it happening.

essentially the little black hole would be falling in just the way a lot of other stuff is falling in----stones, old copies of Time magazine, cast-off Television sets, and whatever else.
 
One of the moderators on sci.physics.research says that a small black hole in a big one is not meaningful because the schwarzschild metric is a unique and spherically symmetric solution for a black hole - do you agree with this?
 
kurious said:
One of the moderators on sci.physics.research says that a small black hole in a big one is not meaningful because the schwarzschild metric is a unique and spherically symmetric solution for a black hole - do you agree with this?

well I defer to any experts, but the schw metric is a static solution that describes a black hole that looks exactly that way forever

I don't imagine one could have a static situation with a little BH inside the horizon of a big BH

But I can imagine a dynamic situation in which BHs collide and merge (producing a wonderful brief storm of gravity waves as they do)

and I can picture a little BH falling towards a big one----on its way to eventual destruction----and their horizons merging amoeba-style as the little one is eaten----and it seems to me that at least temporarily there should be two singularities inside the large one's horizon

it this is impossible mathematically then there's a clearcut issue to discuss here and obviously my intuitive picture is wrong, but I need a good link to something on the web to show me that---do you have the SPR Cornell archive link to that?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top