Can an Electromagnetic Wave Charge a Battery?

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic waves can theoretically induce a current, but the practical application for charging a battery is complex. The discussion highlights that while an EM wave may cause electrons to oscillate, it does not produce a net current necessary for charging. To convert the alternating current generated by such waves into usable direct current, rectification is required. The concept of a rectenna is mentioned as a potential solution for harnessing this energy. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, significant technical challenges remain for practical implementation.
nickerst
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
This is a theoretical question not a homework question, so if this is the wrong section to post this in please let me know. But my friend has this idea that if he sent an electromagnetic wave at a certain frequency at a surface it could create a current and this in turn could charge a battery. Does this sound at all possible to anyone? In my opinion the EM wave would jiggle the electrons back and forth but there would be no net current on the surface so it couldn't actually have a surface current. Any ideas are encouraged. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nickerst said:
This is a theoretical question not a homework question, so if this is the wrong section to post this in please let me know. But my friend has this idea that if he sent an electromagnetic wave at a certain frequency at a surface it could create a current and this in turn could charge a battery. Does this sound at all possible to anyone? In my opinion the EM wave would jiggle the electrons back and forth but there would be no net current on the surface so it couldn't actually have a surface current. Any ideas are encouraged. Thanks!

Your thinking is correct. To use the AC pickup current of an antenna, you would need to rectify it to get useful DC current for charging a battery or whatever:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectenna

.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top