Can an Electrostatic Fluid Accelerator inflate a balloon?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using an electrostatic fluid accelerator (EFA) to inflate a balloon. The original poster seeks feedback on their concept, questioning the source of air and the design of the electrodes. Responses indicate skepticism about the effectiveness of the method, particularly regarding the number of electrodes needed and potential risks associated with ionizing air. Concerns are raised about the practicality of using EFA for applications like balloon inflation, especially considering issues like electrostatic discharge (ESD) in electronic contexts. Ultimately, the idea is to charge and repel air into a balloon, but doubts about its success persist.
smiddleton
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
I am trying out an idea. I want to see if I can make an electrostatic fluid accelerator inflate a balloon. Attached is an image of a concept I came up with that works a little differently. Before I dive in, I was wondering if anyone on the forum could tell me if my concept might or might not work. Thanks in advance for the help.
 

Attachments

  • EFA concept.jpg
    EFA concept.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 707
Physics news on Phys.org
If the end is closed, where does the air come from? What exactly is the "fluid" you're planning to use?
How exactly are the electrodes made? Are they on the outer side of an isolated cylinder?
Are the electrodes powered by a constant voltage or are they pulsed? How many volts and amperes can you supply?

In short, I don't think it's going to do anything at all. In particular I don't see a point in using more than 2 electrodes.
 
Might be difficult to get one to inflate a balloon but the principle of electrostatic air movers is well known :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_fluid_accelerator
 
Nidum said:
Might be difficult to get one to inflate a balloon but the principle of electrostatic air movers is well known :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_fluid_accelerator
Interesting. But from the article:
wikipedia said:
The basic principle has been understood for some time but only in recent years have seen developments in the design and manufacture of EFA devices that may allow them to find practical and economical applications, such as in micro-cooling of electronics components.
It seems like ionizing air to generate the air movement electrically and re-neutralizing the air before blowing it on electronic circuits would be risky. Seems like a good way to get ESD and Electrical Overstress issues introduced in the circuit (if the neutralization isn't real uniform and complete by the time the airstream hits the components)...
 
Agreed - doesn't seem like a good thing to use for electronics cooling !
 
Thanks for the feedback. It's not for electronics cooling. It's an idea for compressing air. There would be air in the tube, the idea is to charge the air in the tube, then repel it into the balloon. If the tube was small in diameter, 1/4 inch, and there was one electrode at negative and one positive switching polarity, would that repel the air into the balloon?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top