Can an object have both potential and kinetic energy?

AI Thread Summary
An object can possess both potential and kinetic energy simultaneously, as demonstrated by a knife on a table, which has gravitational potential energy while also gaining kinetic energy when moved. The potential energy remains even as kinetic energy is introduced, illustrating that multiple energy forms can coexist. This principle is applicable in various scenarios, such as the dynamics of airplanes during takeoff and landing, where energy transitions are crucial. The equation E=Ek+Ep remains valid as it accounts for both energy types, which can exist together. Understanding this concept is essential for grasping energy dynamics in physical systems.
fawk3s
Messages
341
Reaction score
1
Hi

I was just wondering if a body can have potential and kinetic energy at the same time?
Say there was a knife on a table. So the knife would have potential energy over Earth. And I would move that knife abit left, giving it kinetic energy.
The potential energy which the knife has over Earth would remain, right? Or would it somehow transfer into kinetic energy?

My friend said that if a body has kinetic energy, it can't have potential energy. I don't want to agree, so I thought I'd ask here for confirmation.
But if my friend is right, what's the point of the equation E=Ek+Ep, if either Ek=0 or Ep=0?

I mean, I can be wrong, and I usually am. And if I am, don't mock me lolz.

Thanks in advance,
fawk3s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right, an object can have potential energy and kinetic energy at the same time.

Let's say you knock your knife over the table so that you give it an initial kinetic energy as it heads to the ground in addition to its gravitational potential energy that it had from being on the table. In fact, if it were a charged particle in an electric field it could have electric potential energy also.

So, an object can have any number of different kinds of energies it wants, it just depends on the physical situation.
 
True.
For example for four bodies A, B, C and D there are
the kinetic energies A, B, C and D
and the potential energies AB, AC, AD, BC, BD, CD
All these exist at the same time.
 
In airplanes, the concept of trading between the two is very important. Ie, when decending into a landing, you need to dissipate potential energy without gaining kinetic energy (and actually losing some eventually). After takeoff, you gain potential energy while maintaining a certain minimum kinetic energy.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top