Can Antenna reduce the radio signal strength when it receive

AI Thread Summary
An antenna does take energy from a radio signal when receiving it, but this energy extraction is minimal and does not significantly affect the signal strength for nearby receivers. The discussion clarifies that while an increase in the number of antennas does not measurably decrease reception power, it can lead to interference if antennas are aligned improperly, causing shadowing effects. The energy emitted by a transmitter remains largely unaffected by the number of receiving antennas, as most of the energy continues to propagate beyond them. In specific scenarios, such as with vertically polarized ground waves, unique propagation characteristics can influence signal strength in urban environments. Overall, the principles of antenna operation and signal reception highlight the complexities of radio wave interactions.
physicsEnthu_123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
  • When antenna receive the radio signal does it reduce the actual radio signal strength or strength indeed depends on the dispersion loss and other dielectric absorption?
  • If antenna doesn’t reduce the radio signal strength(power), how it generates the current in the receiving antenna circuit? How antenna in this case is not affected by law of conservation - radio signal doesn’t loose its power even generating current in the antenna.
  • If antenna affects the signal strength of the radio signal, does more antenna means more power to transmit for transmitter?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
physicsEnthu_123 said:
  • When antenna receive the radio signal does it reduce the actual radio signal strength or strength indeed depends on the dispersion loss and other dielectric absorption?
Yes, when an antenna receives a radio signal it is taking energy away from the radiowave. For most practical systems this is a tiny amount of energy, though. When I tune my FM radio to a signal, it has no significant effect on the signal strength available to my next door neighbor.

physicsEnthu_123 said:
  • If antenna affects the signal strength of the radio signal, does more antenna means more power to transmit for transmitter?
I'm not sure what you are talking about here - I thought you were discussing a receive antenna. What transmitter are you referring to?

Jason
 
physicsEnthu_123 said:
does more antenna means more power to transmit for transmitter?

The energy has already been emitted so it is irrelevant to the transmitter if you collect that energy or it just continues on by. This will not be true if you are close enough for near field effects to come into play. Then you are affecting the characteristics of the transmitting antenna.

BoB
 
So if I have satellite transmitter and my transmitting power should cover only area depending upon the dispersion loss by inverse R^2. If i have increase number of antenna does my transmitting power needs to be increased since there are losses? In other scenario if I have a close room and I have a transmitter with a fixed power. If my number of antenna increase does the reception power decreases?
 
physicsEnthu_123 said:
If my number of antenna increase does the reception power decreases?

not in a measurable way ( well I would be surprised is it could be) ... there is still much more energy bypassing all those antennas (not being captured ) than what is captured.
Now if you have antennas in a line, that is different as the rear antenna will be in the shadow of the front antenna ( the one closer to the transmitter) and it will of course receive less signal

read again JasonRF's post and his first comment ... That is your answer
 
davenn said:
Now if you have antennas in a line, that is different as the rear antenna will be in the shadow of the front antenna ( the one closer to the transmitter) and it will of course receive less signal
That general principle certainly applies in most cases. There is an interesting exception to this principle, though. Medium Frequency (vertically polarised of course) ground waves will propagate along the ground and follow the curve of the Earth. The energy does not tend to carry out along a tangent but the wave front has a forward tilt, due to resistive losses in the Earth. Energy gets directed downwards, out of the region just above the surface. Cities, with lots of steel structures (and receiving antennae) have a definite shadow, downstream from a transmitter but the signal strength rises back up, after a few km to what you'd expect, if the city were not there.
This forward tilt of a VP wave can be used by long wire antennae, supported on a series of short poles, radially in the direction of travel of the wave. Google Beverage Antenna; an excellent, cheap and cheerful directional MF antenna (OK if you happen to have a few hundred metres of land available).
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top