Can anyone recommend an introductory Calculus book for a Grade 11 student?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheShapeOfTime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Calculus
AI Thread Summary
For Grade 11 students seeking an introductory calculus book, several recommendations include "The Calculus" by Leithold, "Calculus Made Easy" by Silvanus P. Thompson, and "A First Course in Calculus" by Serge Lang. Calculus is essential for understanding physics, as it is deeply intertwined with the subject. It's important to choose a book that aligns with whether the focus is on concepts or practice, as many texts cater to either mathematicians or engineers. Students are encouraged to explore multiple books at a library to find the one that suits their learning style. A solid calculus foundation should include exposure to proofs to develop reasoning skills, as many high school courses often emphasize computation over theory.
TheShapeOfTime
Can anyone recommend an introductory Calculus book for a Grade 11 student? I know this may sound dumb, but could anyone also fill me in on how much Calculus is acutaly used in subjects like Physics? I get the impression it's used a ton...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Calculus and physics are inseparable. You can't understand physics truly without calculus, in my opinion. I've only used two different books but I liked Leithold's The Calculus. I picked up the 2nd edition a few years ago when I was a freshmeat in HS for 5 bucks and found it easy to self-study out of. I think it's up to the 7th or 8th edition now though. I'd recommend the book though over the garbage one the University I go to now has.
 
See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=28094

It will help to consider whether you want to focus on concepts or practice, as most books focus on one or the other, i.e. they are aimed primarily at either mathematicians or physicists/engineers.

Good luck,
Rachel
 
Thanks for the link and advice.
 
cheap, basic and fun: Calculus made easy, by silvanus p. thompson.

Motivated and well written: Lectures on freshman calculus, by cruse and granville.

expert, concise, excellent on ideas: A first course in calculus, by Serge Lang.

classic, traditional and competent engineering text: Calculus and Analytic geometry, by George B. Thomas.

a classic of rigor and applications, thorough - going for serious students of science: Differential and Integral Calculus, by Richard Courant.

books for future mathematicians: Calculus, by Michael Spivak, or the book by Tom Apostol.


Suggestion: Go to a library that has several of the recommended books and look them over to see which ones you like. And look at some we have not mentioned, i.e. find your own way.

try to find one that has some proofs in it so you begin to learn to reason. My recent honors calculus classes in college are totally bereft of any experience of theory in calculus. High school courses in calculus are notoruious for omitting all the ideas and focusing only on computation. The AP tests are pretty sorry in this respect as well.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top