Can anyone verify if this logic has truth

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnhaley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a friend's injury on a water slide, specifically the forces at play during the slide. It highlights misconceptions about gravity and acceleration, clarifying that the acceleration due to gravity is approximately 32.2 ft/s² in free fall, not necessarily applicable on a water slide. The conversation points out that while water reduces friction, it does not allow a person to exceed gravitational acceleration. Additionally, the angle of the slide impacts acceleration, contradicting the friend's assertion that speed is solely determined by gravity. Overall, the friend's logic regarding forces and acceleration on a water slide is deemed incorrect.
johnhaley
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone verify if this logic has truth!

Homework Statement



My friend and I were having a chat about a friend that got injured on a water slide. He started to explain the physics of her body and its movement on a water slide and not being a physicist I want to see if someone can verify his logic. Heres the way i recall his explanation... all name and locations are change to protect identities :)

Me: Now when you were talking about forces of gravity and speeds on a water slide, you don't really know what the force of gravity was on jessica on the particular slides at waterland, right?

My Friend: Well, we know it's 32 feet per second per second your acceleration, and your forces, mass times acceleration. So its your body weight times your acceleration. I'm not a great physicist, but it can be figure out pretty easily by multiplying her weight in kilograms or actually her weight in pounds by 32 feet per second and your going to get the forces. There going to be several times body weight.

Me: But you really can't say what those are. I mean your not a physicist, right, your not--

My Friend: No I'm not a physicist, but the numbers are easy to figure, by even a lay person whos taken basic physics. It's mass, her body weight, times acceleration, 32 feet per second per second. you only need to know how many second she was on the slide. You know what her weight is and the 32 feet is constant. You don't need to be a physicist to figure out the force.

Me: But speed is a factor, right?

My Friend: speed is 32 feet per second per second gravity.

Me: that's in a free fall, in a vacuum right?

My Friend: Believe it or not you actually go faster when you have water underneath you in a water slide then 32 feet per second per second. So we know the minimum amount of force with her.

DOES ANY OF THIS MAKE SENSE. CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT IS VALID AND WHAT IS NOT. YOUR HELP IS APPRECIATED
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The friend is incorrect and terminology is incorrect.

The acceleration, g, at sealevel due to gravity is 32.2 ft/s2 or 9.81 m/s2, and this is the acceleration an object would experience in freefall.

The weigth of an object is equal to its mass (that property of matter which resists acceleration, or change in velocity) and the acceleration.

On a water slide, one certainly does not exceed the acceleration of gravity due to the resistance of the water and the fact that one is not falling vertically in free fall, and the acceleration a is given by g sin\theta, where \theta is the angle of the incline with respect to horizontal.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mincl.html#c3

The water reduces the friction with the slide, but does not eliminate it.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mincl.html#c2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top